Hi,
On 27-06-2019 20:02, Justin B Rye wrote:
> Justin B Rye wrote:
>> Okay, so here's a first rough idea of what the release-notes might
>> say.
>
> Properly formatted patch attached.
Pushed that patch to the archive. Thanks.
Paul
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Control: reassign -1 chrony 3.4-4
Control: retitle -1 chrony: autopkgtest regression due to new clknetsim
Hi Vincent,
On 27-06-2019 20:33, Vincent Blut wrote:
>> Currently this regression is blocking the migration of
>> init-system-helpers to testing [1]. Due to the nature of this issue, I
>>
Processing control commands:
> reassign -1 chrony 3.4-4
Bug #931181 [src:init-system-helpers, src:chrony] init-system-helpers breaks
chrony autopkgtest
Bug reassigned from package 'src:init-system-helpers, src:chrony' to 'chrony'.
No longer marked as found in versions chrony/3.4-4 and
Processing control commands:
> tag -1 pending
Bug #929730 [systemd] systemd: boot-and-services test expects first kernel log
line, but not always in logs
Added tag(s) pending.
--
929730: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=929730
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact
Am 27.06.19 um 20:02 schrieb Justin B Rye:
> Justin B Rye wrote:
>> Okay, so here's a first rough idea of what the release-notes might
>> say.
>
> Properly formatted patch attached.
>
Afaiu, the kernel default is to create one dummy device by default when
the module is loaded.
I assume there
Hi,
On Thu, Jun 27, 2019 at 06:57:15PM +0200, Paul Gevers wrote:
Source: init-system-helpers, chrony
Control: found -1 init-system-helpers/1.57
Control: found -1 chrony/3.4-4
Severity: important
X-Debbugs-CC: debian...@lists.debian.org
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: breaks
Justin B Rye wrote:
> Okay, so here's a first rough idea of what the release-notes might
> say.
Properly formatted patch attached.
--
JBR with qualifications in linguistics, experience as a Debian
sysadmin, and probably no clue about this particular package
diff --git a/en/issues.dbk
Source: init-system-helpers, chrony
Control: found -1 init-system-helpers/1.57
Control: found -1 chrony/3.4-4
Severity: important
X-Debbugs-CC: debian...@lists.debian.org
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: breaks needs-update
Dear maintainers,
With a recent upload of init-system-helpers
Processing control commands:
> found -1 init-system-helpers/1.57
Bug #931181 [src:init-system-helpers, src:chrony] init-system-helpers breaks
chrony autopkgtest
Marked as found in versions init-system-helpers/1.57.
> found -1 chrony/3.4-4
Bug #931181 [src:init-system-helpers, src:chrony]
ack - let me redo this a bit and open a MR in salsa.
On Thu, Jun 27, 2019 at 10:45 AM Martin Pitt wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> rmmod failure due to "busy" is annoying indeed, and a bit hard to fix, thus
> your approach with removing the individual hosts instead seems fine.
>
> If the module isn't
Hello,
rmmod failure due to "busy" is annoying indeed, and a bit hard to fix, thus
your approach with removing the individual hosts instead seems fine.
If the module isn't available though, I'd consider this a bad testbed.
autopkgtest's testbed VM construction scripts (VM, container, cloud) all
Opened MR:
https://salsa.debian.org/systemd-team/systemd/merge_requests/34
thanks!
On Tue, Jun 25, 2019 at 4:55 PM Michael Biebl wrote:
>
> Am 25.06.19 um 22:51 schrieb Michael Biebl:
> > Dan, could you submit your patch as merge request?
>
> Btw, we use gbp-dch style commit messages.
>
> E.g.
Processing control commands:
> tag -1 pending
Bug #927911 [systemd] systemd: Clarify documentation of %h specifier
Added tag(s) pending.
--
927911: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=927911
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Processing control commands:
> tag -1 pending
Bug #929726 [systemd] ask-password: prevent buffer overrow when reading from
keyring
Added tag(s) pending.
--
929726: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=929726
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
On 6/27/19 9:20 AM, andreimpope...@gmail.com wrote:
> On Jo, 27 iun 19, 00:37:01, Justin B Rye wrote:
>>
>> Okay, so here's a first rough idea of what the release-notes might
>> say. It would make sense to put the new section after the existing
>> one on deprecating old-style interface names.
On Jo, 27 iun 19, 00:37:01, Justin B Rye wrote:
>
> Okay, so here's a first rough idea of what the release-notes might
> say. It would make sense to put the new section after the existing
> one on deprecating old-style interface names. Something like:
>
>
> _Module configuration for bonding
Hi,
On Wed, 26 Jun 2019, Michael Biebl wrote:
> I agree. While setting up an IPv6 address and at the same time disabling
> IPv6 on the kernel side could be seen as a misconfiguration, it might
> just as well be plain oversight on the admin's side.
> networkd behaving more sensibly in that case is
17 matches
Mail list logo
