]] Christoph Anton Mitterer
> By looking at that goal (which is a good goal of course) we "loose"
> however that strict serialisation that we more or less had with
> sysvinit.
sysvinit isn't serialised today either.
> In sysvinit, each services simply depended e.g. on $network, when he did
> n
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> reassign 748844 lxsession
Bug #748844 [systemd] systemd, lxsession-logout no Stop Restart
Bug reassigned from package 'systemd' to 'lxsession'.
No longer marked as found in versions systemd/204-8.
Ignoring request to alter fixed versions of bug #7
Hi Michael.
On Wed, 2014-05-21 at 00:14 +0200, Michael Biebl wrote:
> I have no idea what you mean with passive dependencies.
Well I hope I've had that explained by the examples I gave.
What I mean was:
Usually none of the services depends (directly) on ,
or or or ...
One goal of systemd was
Package: lintian
Version: 2.5.22.1
Severity: normal
Hi,
lintian should generate a warning/error when a package is shipping a
systemd service file but is not calling the init-system-helpers scripts,
especially for the services containing an [Install] section.
If a package is not calling these hel
Package: systemd
Version: 204-8
Severity: important
Dear Maintainer,
*** Reporter, please consider answering these questions, where appropriate ***
* What led up to the situation?
* What exactly did you do (or not do) that was effective (or
ineffective)?
* What was the outcome of t
Hi Laurent,
Laurent Bigonville writes:
> However, I think that all the packages that are shipping a .service
> file WITH an [Install] section must really call init-system-helpers
> even if the service is disabled or not automatically started at boot.
> If it's not the case and if the user has exp
