Bug#760526: Enable AppArmor support (using libapparmor)

2014-09-23 Thread intrigeri
Hi, intrigeri wrote (09 Sep 2014 00:14:30 GMT) : > So: yes, please. I've been waiting for it eagerly, and will submit > patches to the Tor upstream unit file as soon as Debian's systemd > supports this option. I really want this to land in time for Jessie, so I've given it a try: 1. added libapp

Bug#762558: systemd fails to get dbus connection while dbus is running

2014-09-23 Thread Martin Steigerwald
Package: systemd Version: 215-4 Severity: normal Dear Maintainer, Since yesterday I get merkaba:~> LANG=C systemctl Failed to get D-Bus connection: Unknown error -1 right after boot. Either in started Plasma desktop as well as on TTY1 without started desktop. Also in KDE the menu entry for sus

Bug#762558: Also happens with debian kernel 3.14-1-amd64 and 3.16-2-amd64…

2014-09-23 Thread Martin Steigerwald
Hi! … as well as my self-compiled 3.17-rc5 (versus rc6 I installed yesterday). So this doesn´t seem to be kernel related. #753576 systemd stopped responding to dbus.socket connections https://bugs.debian/org/753576 is the only similar bug report I found, but I can run dbus-monitor --system an

Bug#762558: init-select adds sysvinit as init system to kernel command line while systemd is there due to /etc/default/grub

2014-09-23 Thread Martin Steigerwald
reassign -1 init-select retitle -1 init-select init-select adds sysvinit as init system to kernel command line while systemd is there due to /etc/default/grub thanks Okay, this happens cause systemd isn´t running: merkaba:~> grep systemd /etc/default/grub GRUB_CMDLINE_LINUX_DEFAULT="init=/bin/s

Processed: init-select adds sysvinit as init system to kernel command line while systemd is there due to /etc/default/grub

2014-09-23 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > reassign 762558 init-select Bug #762558 [systemd] systemd fails to get dbus connection while dbus is running Bug reassigned from package 'systemd' to 'init-select'. No longer marked as found in versions systemd/215-4. Ignoring request to alter fix

Bug#760526: Enable AppArmor support (using libapparmor)

2014-09-23 Thread Michael Biebl
Am 23.09.2014 um 08:51 schrieb intrigeri: > Hi, > > intrigeri wrote (09 Sep 2014 00:14:30 GMT) : >> So: yes, please. I've been waiting for it eagerly, and will submit >> patches to the Tor upstream unit file as soon as Debian's systemd >> supports this option. > > I really want this to land in ti

Bug#762522: marked as done (\2d showing up in journalctl)

2014-09-23 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 23 Sep 2014 18:20:36 +0200 with message-id <20140923162036.ga28...@bongo.bofh.it> and subject line Re: Bug#762522: \2d showing up in journalctl has caused the Debian Bug report #762522, regarding \2d showing up in journalctl to be marked as done. This means that you claim t

Bug#760526: Enable AppArmor support (using libapparmor)

2014-09-23 Thread intrigeri
Hi, Michael Biebl wrote (23 Sep 2014 11:59:22 GMT) : >> a) I don't see any dependency automatically added on libapparmor1, and >>I've no idea which binary package exactly should have it. Any hint? > Did you add "--enable-apparmor" to the configure flags? I didn't: my understanding of the ups

Processed: reassign 762513 to systemd

2014-09-23 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > reassign 762513 systemd 215-4 Bug #762513 [e2fsprogs] FIXED messages seen twice Bug reassigned from package 'e2fsprogs' to 'systemd'. No longer marked as found in versions e2fsprogs/1.42.12-1. Ignoring request to alter fixed versions of bug #76251

Bug#762522: \2d showing up in journalctl

2014-09-23 Thread Uoti Urpala
Marco d'Itri wrote: > On Sep 23, 積丹尼 Dan Jacobson wrote: > > Why the \x2d in one 'slice' but not the other? > Because one contains / and the other does not. 2d hex is '-', not '/'. The actual reason is that '-' in slice names has a special meaning to separate hierarchical components, and '-' with

Bug#760526: Enable AppArmor support (using libapparmor)

2014-09-23 Thread intrigeri
Control: tag -1 + patch Hi, intrigeri wrote (23 Sep 2014 17:01:21 GMT) : > Michael Biebl wrote (23 Sep 2014 11:59:22 GMT) : >>> a) I don't see any dependency automatically added on libapparmor1, and >>>I've no idea which binary package exactly should have it. Any hint? >> Did you add "--enab

Processed: Re: Bug#760526: Enable AppArmor support (using libapparmor)

2014-09-23 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > tag -1 + patch Bug #760526 [systemd] Enable AppArmor support (using libapparmor) Added tag(s) patch. -- 760526: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=760526 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems _