Bug#814758: Case power button is ignored unless dbus is installed.

2016-02-15 Thread Ansgar Burchardt
Josh Triplett writes: > If systemd-logind just needs dbus to check for possible inhibitors, > could systemd-logind simply ignore inhibitors without dbus? systemd-logind failed to start if dbus isn't available (#772700). That's why

Bug#814758: Case power button is ignored unless dbus is installed.

2016-02-15 Thread Josh Triplett
On Mon, 15 Feb 2016 14:45:18 +0100 Michael Biebl wrote: > Am 15.02.2016 um 08:27 schrieb Trent W. Buck: > > It's failing because dbus isn't installed. > > Installing dbus fixes the problem. > > > > systemd Recommends: dbus. > > > > dbus is Priority: standard. > > > >

Bug#737825: hangs on systemd-tty-ask-password-agent reproduced

2016-02-15 Thread Antoine Beaupré
Package: systemd Version: 215-17+deb8u3 I have reproduced the issues described in the bug reports #774153 and #737825 (they look like duplicates to me, really). After a minor apt upgrade run here (libgraphite2 stable update and darktable backport upgrade), needrestart asked me if I wanted to

Processed: [bts-link] source package systemd

2016-02-15 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > # > # bts-link upstream status pull for source package systemd > # see http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2006/05/msg1.html > # > user bts-link-upstr...@lists.alioth.debian.org Setting user to

[bts-link] source package systemd

2016-02-15 Thread bts-link-upstream
# # bts-link upstream status pull for source package systemd # see http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2006/05/msg1.html # user bts-link-upstr...@lists.alioth.debian.org # remote status report for #734007 (http://bugs.debian.org/734007) # Bug title: document implicit After= of

Здравствуйте

2016-02-15 Thread Марианна
___ Pkg-systemd-maintainers mailing list Pkg-systemd-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-systemd-maintainers

Processed: block 814528 with 814778

2016-02-15 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > block 814528 with 814778 Bug #814528 [src:systemd] systemd: Please build with IDN support 814528 was not blocked by any bugs. 814528 was not blocking any bugs. Added blocking bug(s) of 814528: 814778 > thanks Stopping processing here. Please

Bug#814758: marked as done (Case power button is ignored unless dbus is installed.)

2016-02-15 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 15 Feb 2016 14:45:18 +0100 with message-id <56c1d66e.9030...@debian.org> and subject line Re: Bug#814758: Case power button is ignored unless dbus is installed. has caused the Debian Bug report #814758, regarding Case power button is ignored unless dbus is installed. to be

Bug#814240: systemd triggers break upgrades within unstable

2016-02-15 Thread Michael Biebl
Control: reassign -1 aptitude Thanks for the feedback, Guillem. Reassigning to aptitude. Zack, I guess the aptitude maintainers will want to know which aptitude version you are using. Regards, Michael Am 15.02.2016 um 10:48 schrieb Guillem Jover: > Hi! > > On Thu, 2016-02-11 at 00:08:12

Processed: Re: Bug#814240: systemd triggers break upgrades within unstable

2016-02-15 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > reassign -1 aptitude Bug #814240 [systemd] systemd triggers break upgrades within unstable Bug reassigned from package 'systemd' to 'aptitude'. No longer marked as found in versions systemd/228-6. Ignoring request to alter fixed versions of bug #814240 to the same

Processed: reassign to i-s-h

2016-02-15 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > reassign 814666 init-system-helpers Bug #814666 [sysv-rc] sysv-rc: update-rc.d prints incomplete usage (missing 'defaults') Bug reassigned from package 'sysv-rc' to 'init-system-helpers'. No longer marked as found in versions

Bug#814240: systemd triggers break upgrades within unstable

2016-02-15 Thread Guillem Jover
Hi! On Thu, 2016-02-11 at 00:08:12 +0100, Michael Biebl wrote: > Somehow this looks like an issue in dpkg, if it triggers a package which > is in an inconsistent state. After a very quick look it does not seem to me to be an issue in either systemd nor dpkg, see below. > But maybe we just made