Hi Andreas,
Andreas Metzler writes:
> dnsmasq is packaged without debhelper, making this a little bit more
> work. However I have simply checked what dh_systemd /would/ do and
> have manually applied the changes to maintainerscripts and
> dependencies to come up with the the attached patch. Could
On 11/05/14 15:11, Andreas Metzler wrote:
> On 2014-05-11 Michael Biebl wrote:
>> Am 11.05.2014 10:13, schrieb Andreas Metzler:
>>> On 2013-09-25 Julian Andres Klode wrote:
> [...]
dnsmasq currently does not enable its systemd unit in postinst. It should
probably use dh-systemd.
> [...]
On 2014-05-11 Michael Biebl wrote:
> Am 11.05.2014 10:13, schrieb Andreas Metzler:
>> On 2013-09-25 Julian Andres Klode wrote:
[...]
>>> dnsmasq currently does not enable its systemd unit in postinst. It should
>>> probably use dh-systemd.
[...]
>> Isn't this severity serious? I have just gone f
severity 724602 serious
thanks
Am 11.05.2014 10:13, schrieb Andreas Metzler:
> On 2013-09-25 Julian Andres Klode wrote:
>> Package: dnsmasq
>> Version: 2.66-4
>> Severity: normal
>
>> dnsmasq currently does not enable its systemd unit in postinst. It should
>> probably use dh-systemd.
>
>> The
On 2013-09-25 Julian Andres Klode wrote:
> Package: dnsmasq
> Version: 2.66-4
> Severity: normal
> dnsmasq currently does not enable its systemd unit in postinst. It should
> probably use dh-systemd.
> The systemd service should also not rely on the init.d script.
> I CCed pkg-systemd-maintaine
