[Ben Hutchings]
> systemd looks for it:
>
> /lib/systemd/system/systemd-fsck-root.service:ConditionPathExists=!/run/initramfs/fsck-root
Right. Then it isn't worth renaming to please my esthetic sense. :)
Note, I really have retired from sysvinit maintenance in Debian. Not
quite sure if anyone r
On Sun, 2016-01-17 at 15:17 +0100, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
> [Ben Hutchings]
> > > This file name seem a bit misleading, as I would read it to mean
> > > initramfs ask for fsck on the root, not initramfs already did fsck on
> > > the root. What about /run/initramfs/skip-fsck-root or something l
[Ben Hutchings]
>> This file name seem a bit misleading, as I would read it to mean
>> initramfs ask for fsck on the root, not initramfs already did fsck on
>> the root. What about /run/initramfs/skip-fsck-root or something like
>> that instead?
>
> initramfs-tools already creates that file.
Aha.
On Sun, 2016-01-17 at 11:02 +0100, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
> [Ben Hutchings]
> > Control: tag -1 patch
> > ---
> > - checkroot.sh: Do nothing if /run/initramfs/fsck-root exists
>
> This file name seem a bit misleading, as I would read it to mean
> initramfs ask for fsck on the root, not initram
[Ben Hutchings]
> Control: tag -1 patch
> ---
> - checkroot.sh: Do nothing if /run/initramfs/fsck-root exists
This file name seem a bit misleading, as I would read it to mean
initramfs ask for fsck on the root, not initramfs already did fsck on
the root. What about /run/initramfs/skip-fsck-root o
5 matches
Mail list logo
