hi :)
to those working on plasmate: when do you think we could do a pre-release of
it to get it out there to more people? it would be really great to do a
release sometime around 4.4 and i'm willing to do the release management of
it... however, we should have some idea of when such a release w
On January 23, 2010, Nicolas Lécureuil wrote:
> icon.writeConfig("Url", "/usr/share/applications/firefox.desktop")
this now works. the config change is caught when the script exits, but if you
need to you can now also do:
icon.reloadConfig()
at any point to cause it to, well, reload its
> On 2010-02-01 19:49:56, Aaron Seigo wrote:
> > a big patch indeed! nice to see this cleaned up; it looks good and afaics
> > it doesn't introduce any new strings so it should probably be backported to
> > the 4.4 branch. please commit, and if you need someone to do the backport
> > for you,
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://reviewboard.kde.org/r/2779/#review4015
---
Ship it!
a big patch indeed! nice to see this cleaned up; it looks go
> On None, Enrico Ros wrote:
> > plasma bouncing-ball cumulative fixes
sorry, I didn't mean to post this review, and I don't know how to delete it.
- Enrico
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://reviewbo
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://reviewboard.kde.org/r/2779/
---
Review request for Plasma.
Summary
---
A comprehensive patch for the Bounci
On Monday 01 February 2010 16:46:10 Marco Martin wrote:
> On Monday 01 February 2010, Sebastian Kügler wrote:
> > On Monday 01 February 2010 15:05:05 Diego Moya wrote:
> > > Also, maybe the progress bar for running jobs could be placed below
> > > the popups and NotificationScroller, instead of abo
On Monday 01 February 2010, J Janz wrote:
> 2010/2/1 Marco Martin
>
> > could be done as an additional thing, but i think not noticeable enough
> > to not trigger bug reports like
> > https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=217826
> >
> > It might. If you start a copy of files and no popup comes o
On February 1, 2010, Bruno de Oliveira Abinader wrote:
> SVN commit 1083641 by abinader:
>
> Removed implicit enumerated animation movement direction combinations (i.e.
> MoveUpRight) and added support for combinations (i.e. MoveUp|MoveLeft).
> Currently used by RotationStacked and Slide animation
On February 1, 2010, Jonathan Schmidt-Dominé - Developer wrote:
> > i don't think this is a distinction most users are capable of reliably
> > making. this is why the dock concept as see on *Step and MacOS works at
> > all, it seems
>
> When I use MacOS X I have always problems to find some window
2010/2/1 Marco Martin
>
> could be done as an additional thing, but i think not noticeable enough to
> not trigger bug reports like
> https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=217826
>
> It might. If you start a copy of files and no popup comes out but, instead,
only the "i" icon changes to a pie-cha
> i don't think this is a distinction most users are capable of reliably
> making. this is why the dock concept as see on *Step and MacOS works at
> all, it seems
When I use MacOS X I have always problems to find some windows, the dock does
not help me, alt+tab does not help me and spaces+exposé a
On January 31, 2010, Will Stephenson wrote:
> Speaking of this, was there a JS API change between 4.4 and trunk?
there shouldn't be; they should be identical. the idea is to keep strict
compat in the JS API from 4.4.0 onward.
> Specifically, the plasmoid.dataEngine() method appears to have moved
On Monday 01 February 2010, Sebastian Kügler wrote:
> On Monday 01 February 2010 15:05:05 Diego Moya wrote:
> > Also, maybe the progress bar for running jobs could be placed *below*
> > the popups and NotificationScroller, instead of above. This way they
> > wouldn't jump up and down like that.
> >
2010/2/1 Sebastian Kügler
>
> We should try to show the progress in the systray icon itself, IMO. I've
> played
> around with it (connection progress in the networkmanager plasmoid), and it
> works
> nicely for smaller sizes. This way we could show the overall progress as a
> pie or
> ring that
On 01-02-2010 at 15:51:04 Sebastian Kügler wrote:
> On Monday 01 February 2010 15:05:05 Diego Moya wrote:
>> Also, maybe the progress bar for running jobs could be placed *below*
>> the popups and NotificationScroller, instead of above. This way they
>> wouldn't jump up and down like that.
>>
>> (
On Monday 01 February 2010 15:05:05 Diego Moya wrote:
> Also, maybe the progress bar for running jobs could be placed *below*
> the popups and NotificationScroller, instead of above. This way they
> wouldn't jump up and down like that.
>
> (I know, I know it was my idea putting them on top)...
We
Also, maybe the progress bar for running jobs could be placed *below*
the popups and NotificationScroller, instead of above. This way they
wouldn't jump up and down like that.
(I know, I know it was my idea putting them on top)...
On 1 February 2010 14:59, Diego Moya wrote:
> On 1 February 2010
On 1 February 2010 14:41, Marco Martin wrote:
> for all who can't try trunk, a screencast of the current status is there:
> http://www.notmart.org/index.php/Software/The_future_of_notifications
Great work!
Is there a way to show the beginning of the message body for the
popups that are partially
On Tuesday 12 January 2010, Marco Martin wrote:
> Hi all,
> Since a couple of days i had the occasion playing aroung with a neat mobile
> device by Intel. I think it's a good development platform to get
> plasma-mobile started since is basicaly a pc (tough only slightly bigger
> than an n810) so g
On Monday 25 January 2010, Marco Martin wrote:
> howdy all,
> so, based on both ersonal experience and feedbacks i'm of course stilkl not
> happy on how notifications work, that's the pretty hard question of being
> informative enough, vs not entirely cover the screen.
> last thing i was thinking a
On 01-02-2010 at 11:03:29 Marco Martin wrote:
> On Monday 01 February 2010, Emdek wrote:
>> On 01-02-2010 at 00:43:18 Chani wrote:
>> > On January 31, 2010 15:02:40 Emdek wrote:
>> >> On 31-01-2010 at 19:17:10 Aaron J. Seigo wrote:
>> >> > On January 30, 2010, Emdek wrote:
>> >> >> The idea whic
On Monday 01 February 2010, Emdek wrote:
> On 01-02-2010 at 00:43:18 Chani wrote:
> > On January 31, 2010 15:02:40 Emdek wrote:
> >> On 31-01-2010 at 19:17:10 Aaron J. Seigo wrote:
> >> > On January 30, 2010, Emdek wrote:
> >> >> The idea which I currently want to implement is to set for entry /
23 matches
Mail list logo
