2010/3/4 Andrew Hunt andr...@ahunt.org:
Progress has gone quite well, here are a few screens (cut and combined into
one file):
http://img697.imageshack.us/img697/5606/manualpanel2.png
Must it look so similar to old look from KDE3? ;-)
In comments to that bug I've written how it could work:
Hi,
I'd like to step in to defend the interests of us KDE users who won't use
this feature. I want to make sure that it can be configured to not interfere
with my current workflow. My rational is that I've always found this KDE 3
panel feature a little bit annoying, and now the use case it
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://reviewboard.kde.org/r/3143/
---
Review request for Plasma.
Summary
---
This patch replaces the QToolButton
On 5 March 2010 12:12, Diego Moya wrote:
I liked the idea someone proposed to create those buttons as plasmoids so
that each user can decide where to place them (either inside the panel or on
the desktop).
Oh - I forgot: another really good option is having the hide button
showing only under
On Friday 05 March 2010 09:44:33 Emdek wrote:
there is a ToolButton class which is a subclass of QToolButton but
which provides plasma stylings. i wonder if that might look nicer here?
just #include toolbutton.h and then do new ToolButton.
I've done that. Thanks for pointing it out. I was
2010/3/5 Andrzej JR Hunt andr...@ahunt.org:
Must it look so similar to old look from KDE3? ;-)
In comments to that bug I've written how it could work:
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=158556#c33
Maybe at least these buttons could be shown when moving cursor to edge?
Both, for hiding and
On March 5, 2010, Emdek wrote:
2010/3/5 Andrzej JR Hunt andr...@ahunt.org:
I'm not sure about the hiding of the button lengthwise though, since then
the unhiding button/area has to cover the whole width, takes up more
space, or if it's completely invisible until you're close by then you're
On March 5, 2010, Emdek wrote:
In comments to that bug I've written how it could work:
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=158556#c33
a plasmoid is the wrong approach. this is about views, not the scene, and it
should not require special set up by the user. not to mention a 'hide button
on
2010/3/5 Aaron J. Seigo ase...@kde.org:
On March 5, 2010, Emdek wrote:
In comments to that bug I've written how it could work:
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=158556#c33
a plasmoid is the wrong approach. this is about views, not the scene, and it
should not require special set up by the
On Friday 05 March 2010, Emdek wrote:
2010/3/5 Aaron J. Seigo ase...@kde.org:
On March 5, 2010, Emdek wrote:
In comments to that bug I've written how it could work:
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=158556#c33
a plasmoid is the wrong approach. this is about views, not the scene, and
Hi Petri,
I'm in contact with the Debian Qt/KDE packagers team and they asked me to
commit attached patch. I committed a similar patch to marble trunk / 4.4
yesterday.
Can I commit the attached patch to trunk and 4.4?
Kind regards,
Jens-Michael
ps: these are the marble patches:
On March 5, 2010, Jens-Michael Hoffmann wrote:
Hi Petri,
I'm in contact with the Debian Qt/KDE packagers team and they asked me to
commit attached patch. I committed a similar patch to marble trunk / 4.4
yesterday.
Can I commit the attached patch to trunk and 4.4?
sure... :)
--
Aaron
Am Freitag, 5. März 2010 19:01:05 schrieb Aaron J. Seigo:
On March 5, 2010, Jens-Michael Hoffmann wrote:
Hi Petri,
I'm in contact with the Debian Qt/KDE packagers team and they asked me to
commit attached patch. I committed a similar patch to marble trunk / 4.4
yesterday.
Can I
On Thursday 04 March 2010, 13:58 Aaron J. Seigo wrote:
can everyone who wishes to please meet us in #plasma on irc at 16:00 UTC
this saturday so we can go through our 4.5 plans? thanks, and see you
there!
I'll try but not sure how good will be the internet connection on the first day
of a
2010/3/5 Marco Martin notm...@gmail.com:
On Friday 05 March 2010, Emdek wrote:
2010/3/5 Aaron J. Seigo ase...@kde.org:
On March 5, 2010, Emdek wrote:
In comments to that bug I've written how it could work:
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=158556#c33
a plasmoid is the wrong
On March 5, 2010, Yuen Hoe Lim wrote:
I forgot to raise this in the irc meeting earlier :( I think we should
consider the possibility of having the previewer as its own separate
process.
it would be nice. i don't think it's critical for the first release, though.
please add it to the wiki if
Also, if someone has a log of the meeting, or can reply back with the
points discussed after the netsplit happened yesterday, please reply
to this mail with it.
On Fri, Mar 5, 2010 at 4:25 PM, Aaron J. Seigo ase...@kde.org wrote:
On March 5, 2010, Yuen Hoe Lim wrote:
I forgot to raise this in
17 matches
Mail list logo
