Review Request: New Applet handle system

2010-08-26 Thread Giulio Camuffo
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: http://reviewboard.kde.org/r/5155/ --- Review request for Plasma and Aaron Seigo. Summary --- This is a rewamp of

Re: kdereview: adjustable clock

2010-08-26 Thread Emdek
On 25-08-2010 at 17:50:34 Aaron J. Seigo wrote: > On Wednesday, August 25, 2010, Emdek wrote: >> On 24-08-2010 at 23:02:15 Aaron J. Seigo wrote: >> > On Tuesday, August 24, 2010, Emdek wrote: >> >> What specifically doesn't work properly? >> > >> > if i use the pre-built mode with the reflections

Re: BoF session at the MeeGo conference

2010-08-26 Thread Markus Slopianka
On Thursday 26 August 2010 15:22:03 Bart Cerneels wrote: > Has anyone on this list already send a BoF session proposal? > > I was thinking of the following: > > We (KDE) and others (Qt) developers have written a lot of Qt code > already. It makes perfect sense to try and reuse this code on the >

Re: BoF session at the MeeGo conference

2010-08-26 Thread Sebastian Kügler
On Thursday, August 26, 2010 04:07:59 pm Markus Slopianka wrote: > On Thursday 26 August 2010 15:22:03 Bart Cerneels wrote: > > Has anyone on this list already send a BoF session proposal? > Maybe a Plasma developer is interested in presenting Qt-based Plasma > Netbook and maybe even show advanta

Re: kdereview: adjustable clock

2010-08-26 Thread Sebastian Kügler
On Wednesday, August 25, 2010 01:37:45 pm Emdek wrote: > > Or just switch off reflections when in non-Planar mode? > > Switching off parts of code is bad idea, we should not force user to not > use something if we don't know how he want to use it. Plasma's FormFactor is actually designed to giv

Re: kdereview: adjustable clock

2010-08-26 Thread Emdek
On 26-08-2010 at 16:38:23 Sebastian Kügler wrote: > On Wednesday, August 25, 2010 01:37:45 pm Emdek wrote: >> > Or just switch off reflections when in non-Planar mode? >> >> Switching off parts of code is bad idea, we should not force user to not >> use something if we don't know how he want to us

Re: kdereview: adjustable clock

2010-08-26 Thread Aaron J. Seigo
On Thursday, August 26, 2010, Emdek wrote: > Well, this is not relevant in this case, all rendering is done by WebKit, > user only specifies HTML to feed it and only interactions done by applet > are setting default font color, check if background should be displayed > (relevant for desktop) and ca

reminder: use FEATURE, BUG, IMPROVEMENT in commit messages

2010-08-26 Thread Aaron J. Seigo
hi all... this is a reminder to *please* use the keywords "FEATURE", "BUG" and "IMPROVEMENT" in your commit messages for changes that meet those criterion. it's a new thing, so it'll take time for everyone to start doing it out of habit. right now, it isn't happening at all, though. the changel

Re: kdereview: adjustable clock

2010-08-26 Thread Marco Martin
On Thursday 26 August 2010, Aaron J. Seigo wrote: > On Thursday, August 26, 2010, Emdek wrote: > > Well, this is not relevant in this case, all rendering is done by WebKit, > > user only specifies HTML to feed it and only interactions done by applet > > are setting default font color, check if back

Re: BoF session at the MeeGo conference

2010-08-26 Thread Marco Martin
On Thursday 26 August 2010, Markus Slopianka wrote: > On Thursday 26 August 2010 15:22:03 Bart Cerneels wrote: > > Has anyone on this list already send a BoF session proposal? > > > > I was thinking of the following: > > > > We (KDE) and others (Qt) developers have written a lot of Qt code > > al

Re: kdereview: adjustable clock

2010-08-26 Thread Emdek
On 26-08-2010 at 17:24:43 Aaron J. Seigo wrote: > On Thursday, August 26, 2010, Emdek wrote: >> Well, this is not relevant in this case, all rendering is done by >> WebKit, >> user only specifies HTML to feed it and only interactions done by applet >> are setting default font color, check if bac

Re: kdereview: adjustable clock

2010-08-26 Thread Marco Martin
On Thursday 26 August 2010, Emdek wrote: > On 26-08-2010 at 17:24:43 Aaron J. Seigo wrote: > > On Thursday, August 26, 2010, Emdek wrote: > >> Well, this is not relevant in this case, all rendering is done by > >> WebKit, > >> user only specifies HTML to feed it and only interactions done by apple

Re: kdereview: adjustable clock

2010-08-26 Thread Emdek
On 26-08-2010 at 18:00:42 Marco Martin wrote: > On Thursday 26 August 2010, Emdek wrote: >> On 26-08-2010 at 17:24:43 Aaron J. Seigo wrote: >> > On Thursday, August 26, 2010, Emdek wrote: >> >> Well, this is not relevant in this case, all rendering is done by >> >> WebKit, >> >> user only specifi

Re: kdereview: adjustable clock

2010-08-26 Thread Aaron J. Seigo
On Thursday, August 26, 2010, Emdek wrote: > Well, if too big configure ability is a problem then I can always modify it's not "too much configurability" (we're a lot more relaxed on that for things in addons, just as we are with coding style :), but what this particular kind of configurability

Re: kdereview: adjustable clock

2010-08-26 Thread Aaron J. Seigo
On Thursday, August 26, 2010, Marco Martin wrote: > > should be home of all addons, instead of own module, except few which > > could be in kdebase, like for example showdekstop) than wait next ten > > months... > > difference is between what is part of the "official" release ot not > also whathas

Re: kdereview: adjustable clock

2010-08-26 Thread Marco Martin
On Thursday 26 August 2010, Aaron J. Seigo wrote: > On Thursday, August 26, 2010, Marco Martin wrote: > > > should be home of all addons, instead of own module, except few which > > > could be in kdebase, like for example showdekstop) than wait next ten > > > months... > > > > difference is betwee

Re: kdereview: adjustable clock

2010-08-26 Thread Sebastian Kügler
On Thursday, August 26, 2010 06:40:28 pm Aaron J. Seigo wrote: > we're missing git and the release person, so it's moot at this point. We'd also not get those releases translated very well. -- sebas http://www.kde.org | http://vizZzion.org | GPG Key ID: 9119 0EF9

Re: kdereview: adjustable clock

2010-08-26 Thread Emdek
On 26-08-2010 at 17:24:43 Aaron J. Seigo wrote: > On Thursday, August 26, 2010, Emdek wrote: >> Well, this is not relevant in this case, all rendering is done by >> WebKit, >> user only specifies HTML to feed it and only interactions done by applet >> are setting default font color, check if bac

Re: kdereview: adjustable clock

2010-08-26 Thread Emdek
On 26-08-2010 at 18:40:28 Aaron J. Seigo wrote: > so, to sum, in a nice world: > > * kdeplasma-addons and extragear/plasma would have a fast release cycle > based > around a freeze-less branch that feeds down into branches with freezes > for > release purposes > > * some items in kdeplasma-add

Re: kdereview: adjustable clock

2010-08-26 Thread Emdek
On 26-08-2010 at 19:00:22 Marco Martin wrote: > my only concern was about people complaining stuff disappeared from one > release to the other, would having an extragear package be enough for > retrocompatibility or are we condemned to carry those in the main modules > forever? Distributors alrea

Re: kdereview: adjustable clock

2010-08-26 Thread Sebastian Kügler
On Thursday, August 26, 2010 07:13:43 pm Emdek wrote: > On 26-08-2010 at 18:40:28 Aaron J. Seigo wrote: > > so, to sum, in a nice world: > > > > * kdeplasma-addons and extragear/plasma would have a fast release cycle > > based > > around a freeze-less branch that feeds down into branches with fre

Re: kdereview: adjustable clock

2010-08-26 Thread Sebastian Kügler
On Thursday, August 26, 2010 07:06:47 pm Emdek wrote: > Now I've found some counterarguments. ;-) > > If we don't want ship by default things that can "break basic visual > consistencies" then Digital Clock shouldn't be shipped because it has > option to set font color which can lead to make i

Re: kdereview: adjustable clock

2010-08-26 Thread Aaron J. Seigo
On Thursday, August 26, 2010, Sebastian Kügler wrote: > On Thursday, August 26, 2010 06:40:28 pm Aaron J. Seigo wrote: > > we're missing git and the release person, so it's moot at this point. > > We'd also not get those releases translated very well. yes, the fast releases would have spotty tran

Re: kdereview: adjustable clock

2010-08-26 Thread Aaron J. Seigo
On Thursday, August 26, 2010, Emdek wrote: > In my ideal world kdeplasma-addons would not exists at all and it's > contents would be moved mostly to extragear, few useful ones moved to > kdebase. i don't think there are any in there that should be moved to kdebase (in fact, if i had my way, i'd m

Re: reminder: use FEATURE, BUG, IMPROVEMENT in commit messages

2010-08-26 Thread Aleix Pol
On Thu, Aug 26, 2010 at 5:27 PM, Aaron J. Seigo wrote: > hi all... > > this is a reminder to *please* use the keywords "FEATURE", "BUG" and > "IMPROVEMENT" in your commit messages for changes that meet those > criterion. > > it's a new thing, so it'll take time for everyone to start doing it out

Re: kdereview: adjustable clock

2010-08-26 Thread Marco Martin
On Wednesday 25 August 2010, Aaron J. Seigo wrote: > On Wednesday, August 25, 2010, Emdek wrote: > > > /me thinkssome policies about that should be written down somewhere... > > > > Yeah, good idea, but where? > > community.kde.org/Plasma is a good place to start them. here it is a first rough s

Re: reminder: use FEATURE, BUG, IMPROVEMENT in commit messages

2010-08-26 Thread Aaron J. Seigo
On Thursday, August 26, 2010, Aleix Pol wrote: > - Is this a plasma thing or a KDE thing? (like for stats or something) just a plasma thing only for now. trying to get away from manually managing the changelogs, and i feel we're at a point of project maturity that we can indeed start to automate

Re: kdereview: adjustable clock

2010-08-26 Thread Marco Martin
On Thursday 26 August 2010, Emdek wrote: > If we don't want ship by default things that can "break basic visual > consistencies" then Digital Clock shouldn't be shipped because it has > option to set font color which can lead to make it not readable if set to > one which is similar to background.