---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://svn.reviewboard.kde.org/r/5225/
---
(Updated 2010-09-07 17:43:25.444375)
Review request for kwin, Plasma and Mar
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://svn.reviewboard.kde.org/r/5225/
---
(Updated 2010-09-07 17:31:30.991381)
Review request for kwin, Plasma and Mar
On Tuesday 07 September 2010 18:18:00 nuno pinheiro wrote:
Hi Nuno,
> i have the icon fixed just need to convert my http checkout from svn to ssh
> what is teh comand again :)?
svn switch --relocate https://@svn.kde.org/home/kde/
svn+ssh://@svn.kde.org/home/kde/
Anne-Marie
__
On Tuesday, September 7, 2010, Chani wrote:
> On September 7, 2010 10:01:57 Sebastian Kügler wrote:
> > On Tuesday, August 31, 2010 21:37:15 Chani wrote:
> > > On August 31, 2010 04:41:11 Sebastian Kügler wrote:
> > > > On Wednesday, August 18, 2010 22:27:12 Aaron J. Seigo wrote:
> > > > > as for t
On Tuesday 07 September 2010 22:31:51 Anton Kreuzkamp wrote:
> The problem by that is that in perspective transformation you can't simply
> turn it, but you need a vanishing point. Currently QTransform has a method
> to rotate by the X- and Y-Axis but it sets the Y-coordinate automatically
> to 0 (
The problem by that is that in perspective transformation you can't simply
turn it, but you need a vanishing point. Currently QTransform has a method to
rotate by the X- and Y-Axis but it sets the Y-coordinate automatically to 0
(relative to the widgets top) and so the 3D-effect isn't really con
On Tuesday 07 September 2010 20:24:28 Diego Moya wrote:
> On 7 September 2010 14:33, Asraniel wrote:
> > Appart from the wrongly choosen icon (which looks like a refresh button),
> > i really can't see any problem with that feature.
> > Don't let us go the gnome way and delete every feature that no
On Tue, Sep 7, 2010 at 5:03 PM, Anton Kreuzkamp wrote:
>>I wish there was a trapezoid/shear mapping feature so I could also add
>>some perspective effect to the widgets. Where is the wishlist kept for
>>plasmoid features?
>
> As I said before I'm currently working on it (only via desktop scripting
>I wish there was a trapezoid/shear mapping feature so I could also add
>some perspective effect to the widgets. Where is the wishlist kept for
>plasmoid features?
As I said before I'm currently working on it (only via desktop scripting to
not clutter the interface - maybe if the majority sais it
>
> Good design implies that less-used features are made less pronounced. I for
> one find the whole widget toolbar too intrusive. I put my widgets
> side-by-side on the desktop, and during normal use the toolbar on one
> widget will overlap the one besides it, obscuring its contents. I would be
On September 7, 2010 10:01:57 Sebastian Kügler wrote:
> On Tuesday, August 31, 2010 21:37:15 Chani wrote:
> > On August 31, 2010 04:41:11 Sebastian Kügler wrote:
> > > On Wednesday, August 18, 2010 22:27:12 Aaron J. Seigo wrote:
> > > > as for thumbnails .. it's likely posible to do so for currentl
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://svn.reviewboard.kde.org/r/5225/#review7460
---
The ifdefs doesn't make sense. It looks to me like the effect requ
On 7 September 2010 14:33, Asraniel wrote:
> Appart from the wrongly choosen icon (which looks like a refresh button), i
> really can't see any problem with that feature.
> Don't let us go the gnome way and delete every feature that not at least
> 100%
> of the people use.
>
I don't think we're t
On Tuesday, August 31, 2010 21:37:15 Chani wrote:
> On August 31, 2010 04:41:11 Sebastian Kügler wrote:
> > On Wednesday, August 18, 2010 22:27:12 Aaron J. Seigo wrote:
> > > as for thumbnails .. it's likely posible to do so for currently running
> > > containments, but much harder to do for ones t
On Tuesday 07 September 2010 17:05:31 todd rme wrote:
> I personally use it in two different ways. One is that I have my
> sticky note rotated a little bit to make it more visually distinctive.
> The other is that I have two fuzzy clocks rotated so their left edges
> are roughly tangent to the ed
I personally use it in two different ways. One is that I have my
sticky note rotated a little bit to make it more visually distinctive.
The other is that I have two fuzzy clocks rotated so their left edges
are roughly tangent to the edge of the clock where they touch it
(about 30 degrees above an
On Tuesday, September 7, 2010, Markus Slopianka wrote:
> I wonder why Plasma widgets in Plasma Desktop can be rotated. Why would
> anyone need individual widgets to be upside down?
ignoring that "upside down" is leading hyperbole:
on a stationary, vertical screen: aesthetics.
on a screen laying
On Tuesday, September 7, 2010, Markus Slopianka wrote:
> I guess those numbers are leftovers from a time both were still in
> pre-release. IMO both should now match the overall KDE Platform version
> number
it's just the version of that particular binary.
Gwenview: 2.4.0
Dolphin: 1.5
KPatience:
On Tuesday 07 September 2010 14:24:19 Yuen Hoe Lim wrote:
> Regarding the rotate icon, perhaps making the arrow go just half a circle
> round or less (and maybe add a dot in the middle) instead of a full round
> like now might make it less reload-like? Just a thought. All reload buttons
> I've seen
Regarding the rotate icon, perhaps making the arrow go just half a circle
round or less (and maybe add a dot in the middle) instead of a full round
like now might make it less reload-like? Just a thought. All reload buttons
I've seen are nearly full-circle, since it's supposed to suggest a cycle.
R
On Tuesday 07 September 2010 13:48:53 Markus Slopianka wrote:
> On Tuesday 07 September 2010 12:11:52 nuno pinheiro wrote:
> > let me ask its the other way arround, why not?
>
> "Because we can" is the worst possible reason for anything.
>
> > does it create visual cluter? no..
> Sure it does.
On Tue, Sep 7, 2010 at 6:00 AM, Markus Slopianka wrote:
> Hi.
> I wonder why Plasma widgets in Plasma Desktop can be rotated. Why would
> anyone need
> individual widgets to be upside down? Isn't this one of those micro-options
> we once stated
> to get rid of?
>
I don't know about upside-down.
On Tuesday 07 September 2010 12:11:52 nuno pinheiro wrote:
> let me ask its the other way arround, why not?
"Because we can" is the worst possible reason for anything.
> does it create visual cluter? no..
Sure it does. Every additional button adds clutter, even if only by a small
amount.
Why
On Tuesday 07 September 2010 12:41:14 Eckhart Wörner wrote:
> Hi Nuno,
>
> Am Dienstag, 07. September 2010, 11:11:52 schrieb nuno pinheiro:
> > let me ask its the other way arround, why not?
> >
> > does it create visual cluter? no.. (its stiting on a very clean side
> > andle that as not that m
Appart from the wrongly choosen icon (which looks like a refresh button), i
really can't see any problem with that feature.
Don't let us go the gnome way and delete every feature that not at least 100%
of the people use.
Am Dienstag 07 September 2010, um 14.27:43 schrieb Diego Moya:
> On 7 Septe
On 7 September 2010 13:13, Anne-Marie Mahfouf wrote:
> Most Picture Frame users have several such applets on their desktop and
> rotate
> them to get a visually improved desktop. The Picture Frame applet is
> probably
> the strongest use case in rotating widgets.
> I don't imagine using it without
Hi Nuno,
Am Dienstag, 07. September 2010, 11:11:52 schrieb nuno pinheiro:
> let me ask its the other way arround, why not?
>
> does it create visual cluter? no.. (its stiting on a very clean side andle
> that as not that many options)
with the current icon design, yes, it creates some confusion
On Tuesday 07 September 2010 12:00:15 Markus Slopianka wrote:
> Hi.
> I wonder why Plasma widgets in Plasma Desktop can be rotated. Why would
> anyone need individual widgets to be upside down? Isn't this one of those
> micro-options we once stated to get rid of?
>
> Markus
Most Picture Frame use
I can't answer your question, as I'm not the one who wrote it, but I agree
that it is needless for the normal user.
Nevertheless I think that there are a couple of users who are using it.
I would propose to add a rotate() method to the desktop-scripting and remove
the option in the GUI. So power
That isn't like an option in the config dialog that requires the code to do
something like:
if (option) {
do_something();
} else {
do_something_else();
}
It is a simple button in AppletHandle that sets a transform to the applet. If
it
will be removed it won't be necessary to dig through
On Tuesday 07 September 2010 11:00:15 Markus Slopianka wrote:
> Hi.
> I wonder why Plasma widgets in Plasma Desktop can be rotated. Why would
> anyone need individual widgets to be upside down? Isn't this one of those
> micro-options we once stated to get rid of?
>
> Markus
> _
For example my girlfriend has all her picture frames slightly rotated.
But i can't think of a usecase for turning them totaly upside down.
Beat Wolf
Am Dienstag 07 September 2010, um 12.00:15 schrieb Markus Slopianka:
> Hi.
> I wonder why Plasma widgets in Plasma Desktop can be rotated. Why woul
Hi.
I wonder why Plasma widgets in Plasma Desktop can be rotated. Why would anyone
need
individual widgets to be upside down? Isn't this one of those micro-options we
once stated
to get rid of?
Markus
___
Plasma-devel mailing list
Plasma-devel@kde.or
Hi there.
Out of curiosity I happened to enter those commands into Konsole:
# plasma-desktop --version
Plasma Workspace: 0.3
# plasma-netbook --version
Plasma Netbook: 0.1
See the printed version numbers.
I guess those numbers are leftovers from a time both were still in pre-release.
IMO both sh
34 matches
Mail list logo
