Re: Tokamak V: please confirm and price estimation

2011-02-25 Thread Ivan Čukić
Which dates did we agree upon? -- Cheerio, Ivan -- While you were hanging yourself on someone else's words Dying to believe in what you heard I was staring straight into the shining sun ___ Plasma-devel mailing list Plasma-devel@kde.org

Re: The future of virtual desktops

2011-02-25 Thread Jeffery MacEachern
On Thu, Feb 24, 2011 at 22:56, Tomaz Canabrava tcanabr...@kde.org wrote: Kun Zhang, actually windows are managed by virtual desktops in kde 4.6 Er, I think you meant to say windows are managed by Activities in 4.6? Anyhow, to elaborate on what I think you meant, you can use the Activities

Re: Tokamak V: please confirm and price estimation

2011-02-25 Thread Marco Martin
On Friday 25 February 2011, Ivan Čukić wrote: Which dates did we agree upon? week of 25th april Cheers, Marco Martin ___ Plasma-devel mailing list Plasma-devel@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/plasma-devel

Re: The future of virtual desktops

2011-02-25 Thread Anton Kreuzkamp
Now the question is, what will happen with virtual desktops? If not, this thread can serve as a place for discussing this. I also disagree with the idea of droping virtual desktops in favour of activities. But I was thinking about how to differetiate them better, and I came to the

Re: GSoC on Porting Plasmoids to QML

2011-02-25 Thread Anton Kreuzkamp
On Thursday 24 February 2011 22:05:15 Marco Martin wrote: On Thursday 24 February 2011, Anton Kreuzkamp wrote: Just a quick note: I'm currently already working at porting the remember the milk plasmoid to QML, so if you're thinking about which plasmoids to port, please consider rtm as

Re: GSoC on Porting Plasmoids to QML

2011-02-25 Thread Marco Martin
On Friday 25 February 2011, Anton Kreuzkamp wrote: On Thursday 24 February 2011 22:05:15 Marco Martin wrote: On Thursday 24 February 2011, Anton Kreuzkamp wrote: Just a quick note: I'm currently already working at porting the remember the milk plasmoid to QML, so if you're thinking

Re: The future of virtual desktops

2011-02-25 Thread Kun Zhang
On Fri, Feb 25, 2011 at 4:15 PM, Jeffery MacEachern j.maceach...@gmail.comwrote: On Thu, Feb 24, 2011 at 22:56, Tomaz Canabrava tcanabr...@kde.org wrote: Kun Zhang, actually windows are managed by virtual desktops in kde 4.6 Er, I think you meant to say windows are managed by Activities in

Re: The future of virtual desktops

2011-02-25 Thread Nuno Pinheiro
A Sexta, 25 de Fevereiro de 2011 09:46:12 Anton Kreuzkamp você escreveu: Now the question is, what will happen with virtual desktops? If not, this thread can serve as a place for discussing this. I also disagree with the idea of droping virtual desktops in favour of activities. But I

Re: The future of virtual desktops

2011-02-25 Thread Anton Kreuzkamp
On Friday 25 February 2011 12:28:51 Nuno Pinheiro wrote: You would like my solution to this problem... I call its space :) the desktp is a view on a linear expanding space (it just expandes side ways)... that revolves into itself, (you can make the space grow or shrink ). and you can

Re: The future of virtual desktops

2011-02-25 Thread Marco Martin
On Friday 25 February 2011, Nuno Pinheiro wrote: You would like my solution to this problem... I call its space :) the desktp is a view on a linear expanding space (it just expandes side ways)... that revolves into itself, (you can make the space grow or shrink ). and you can scrool the

Re: GSOC 2011 QMLify widgets or something

2011-02-25 Thread Marco Martin
On Thursday 24 February 2011, Travis McHenry wrote: I'm not sure Kopete is a good target, it hasn't had a new release in a long long time, but the general idea is good (QML'ifying some interfaces). now, i'm not sure what is the future of kopete, especially vs telepathy. but i really can see a

Re: The future of virtual desktops

2011-02-25 Thread Hans Chen
On Fri, Feb 25, 2011 at 07:18, Martin Gräßlin mgraess...@kde.org wrote: What I want to know is the following: Are there any plans or outlines regarding how to proceed with virtual desktop (and activities)? Are they documented somewhere? There are no plans to change anything about virtual

Re: The future of virtual desktops

2011-02-25 Thread Marco Martin
On Friday 25 February 2011, Hans Chen wrote: On Fri, Feb 25, 2011 at 07:18, Martin Gräßlin mgraess...@kde.org wrote: What I want to know is the following: Are there any plans or outlines regarding how to proceed with virtual desktop (and activities)? Are they documented somewhere?

Re: The future of virtual desktops

2011-02-25 Thread Gábor Lehel
On Fri, Feb 25, 2011 at 2:44 AM, Aaron J. Seigo ase...@kde.org wrote: On Thursday, February 24, 2011, Hans Chen wrote: What I want to know is the following: Are there any plans or outlines regarding how to proceed with virtual desktop (and activities)? Are they they are orthogonal concepts

Re: The future of virtual desktops

2011-02-25 Thread Gábor Lehel
2011/2/25 Gábor Lehel illiss...@gmail.com: On Fri, Feb 25, 2011 at 2:44 AM, Aaron J. Seigo ase...@kde.org wrote: On Thursday, February 24, 2011, Hans Chen wrote: What I want to know is the following: Are there any plans or outlines regarding how to proceed with virtual desktop (and

Re: Tokamak V: please confirm and price estimation

2011-02-25 Thread Farhad Hedayati-Fard
On Thursday 24 February 2011 22:23:33 Marco Martin wrote: Hi all, the attendees section of the wiki page http://community.kde.org/Plasma/Tokamak5#Attendees_List please, confirm if you have intention to go or remove yourself if you don't want anymore. but most important, put an estimation

Review Request: Add a system tray option to always show all items

2011-02-25 Thread Jonathan Marten
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/100743/ --- Review request for Plasma. Summary --- If the user wishes to have

Re: Tokamak V: please confirm and price estimation

2011-02-25 Thread Sinny Kumari
On Fri, Feb 25, 2011 at 2:53 AM, Marco Martin notm...@gmail.com wrote: Hi all, the attendees section of the wiki page http://community.kde.org/Plasma/Tokamak5#Attendees_List please, confirm if you have intention to go or remove yourself if you don't want anymore. but most important, put an

Re: The future of virtual desktops

2011-02-25 Thread Nuno Pinheiro
A Sexta, 25 de Fevereiro de 2011 12:29:52 Marco Martin você escreveu: On Friday 25 February 2011, Nuno Pinheiro wrote: You would like my solution to this problem... I call its space :) the desktp is a view on a linear expanding space (it just expandes side ways)... that revolves into

Re: Tokamak V: please confirm and price estimation

2011-02-25 Thread Marco Martin
On Friday 25 February 2011, Farhad Hedayati-Fard wrote: Farhad? Romário? Sinny? Hi Marco, I'd really like to come there and participate in the meeting, but as I live in Iran, It's probably so difficult for me to get Visa for Europe counties, Do you provide invitations or something

Re: The future of virtual desktops

2011-02-25 Thread Jeffery MacEachern
On Fri, Feb 25, 2011 at 02:43, Marco Martin notm...@gmail.com wrote: On Friday 25 February 2011, Kun Zhang wrote: this sort of thing, but overall, it works well already.  - Jeffery MacEachern I didn't notice the Activities sub menu on the window title menu before. It works. However,

Re: The future of virtual desktops

2011-02-25 Thread Ryan Rix
Eh? that's only true if you're running kde = 4.4. Upgrade to 4.5 or 4.6 and KWin hides windows that aren't on the current activity. On Fri 25 February 2011 11:39:51 Kun Zhang wrote: I have been trying to use activities in my daily work and found some problems. I have set up two activities: -

Review Request: Blank label for folderview applet

2011-02-25 Thread Farhad Hedayati Fard
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/100750/ --- Review request for Plasma. Summary --- Let the user set a blank

Problems about plasmoid's destroy event

2011-02-25 Thread Kun Zhang
Hi, I'm writing a plasmoid with Python. I have a QTimer to do refresh stuff and it works fine, unless I remove the plasmoid from desktop and the timer's access to applet.isUnderMouse() will cause the whole plasma desktop to crash. I have confirmed that plasma won't crash if I don't start the

Re: Problems about plasmoid's destroy event

2011-02-25 Thread Kun Zhang
On Sat, Feb 26, 2011 at 10:10 AM, Kun Zhang arthur@gmail.com wrote: Hi, I'm writing a plasmoid with Python. I have a QTimer to do refresh stuff and it works fine, unless I remove the plasmoid from desktop and the timer's access to applet.isUnderMouse() will cause the whole plasma desktop