Le mercredi 21 décembre 2011 10:52:48 Viranch Mehta a écrit :
> On Wed, Dec 21, 2011 at 4:55 AM, Guillaume DE BURE <
> guillaume.deb...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > I'm doing this in 4.7.90 (unstable archlinux packages)
> >
>
> You should probably move to KDE compiled from git source.
Probably :) but
On 21 дек 2011 08:25:03 Martin Gräßlin wrote:
> but that's the point. Now in a month someone else wants something completely
> different. Then it's still not the perfect idea to fork Kickoff because of
> one function. A month later the next config option creeps in and another
> one and another one.
On 01/-10/-28163 11:59 AM, Xavier Sythe wrote:
Alexey made several valid points
<< SNIP >>
Regardless of whether the back button is reinstated, I will support
adding the mouse's back button as a way to go back. The back button
is a staple of modern UI, featured prominently in all file/web
On Wednesday 21 December 2011 21:33:52 Martin Klapetek wrote:
> To play the devil's advocate here - as the main reason against bringing it
> back is mostly the increased code complexity, then if you add whole support
> for additional mouse buttons that actually trigger the back action,
which is jus
On Wed, Dec 21, 2011 at 21:07, Alexey Chernov <4er...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 20 дек 2011 19:31:06 Rick Stockton wrote:
> > Alexey, you have two of KDE's smartest people (Aaron and Martin) in
> > agreement that we probably want to provide this via the "Back" Button on
> > the Mouse. (Less new code,
Xavier, while I also want the back button back, it seems to me that you
miss several important points:
As for the notion that most prominent KDE apps don't possess back buttons,
> there are actually quite a few examples, such as Konqueror/Rekonq, the
> "System Settings" application, and Dolphin.
>
On 20 дек 2011 19:31:06 Rick Stockton wrote:
> Alexey, you have two of KDE's smartest people (Aaron and Martin) in
> agreement that we probably want to provide this via the "Back" Button on
> the Mouse. (Less new code, less confusion, less maintenance headache.)
> That's the option on the table, wi
On Wed, Dec 21, 2011 at 12:25 PM, Aaron J. Seigo wrote:
> it's really a horrible hack and i'd suggest getting rid of it. people can add
> the classic menu from the widget explorer like all the rest.
Yes, was just going to suggest that. It'd be nice to have the code
split up too, where it can be,
On Tuesday, December 20, 2011 20:51:32 Martin Graesslin wrote:
> My personal favorite is option 3.
3 is a good solution imho ... except that it will break people's installations
who have kde-workspace but not kdeplasma-addons installed. so we can break
this into two applets, but i don't think we
Alexey made several valid points.
It's not a question of whether or not to "add" a back button, it's a
question of whether or not to restore it.
If it's a question of redundancy, one might argue that the new breadcrumb
navigation could be removed in favour of the classic back button.
After all,
On Tue, Dec 20, 2011 at 8:51 PM, Martin Graesslin wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> in case this mail appears twice, please excuse. It seems to me like
> Akonadi ate my mail :-(
>
> given that master is going to open soon, I have been thinking about
> merging the Kickoff-QML branch to master. Most is done only
On Wednesday, December 21, 2011 16:35:06 Fredrik =?ISO-8859-1?Q?H=F6glund?=
wrote:
> KProtocolInfo::protocolClass() should be used to determine if the URL
> is local or not, since this also affects trash, nepomuk and so forth.
ah, that makes sense. cool, i've made it use KProtocolInfo instead in
On Wednesday 21 December 2011, Aaron J. Seigo wrote:
> On Monday, December 19, 2011 09:25:41 sujith h wrote:
> > Are you trying to access remote site or local host? I had not done anything
> > for
> > local host. If you are trying to access the remote host, can you please
> > share the URL for tha
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/103365/
---
(Updated Dec. 21, 2011, 12:10 p.m.)
Review request for Plasma.
Changes
-
Am 21.12.2011 12:12, schrieb Aaron J. Seigo:
On Wednesday, December 21, 2011 11:45:16 Martin
=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Gr=E4=DFlin?=
wrote:
Am 21.12.2011 11:20, schrieb Aaron J. Seigo:
> hi :)
>
> some of you will have noticed that there is now a KDE/4.8 branch
in
> the
> modules. i would like to reques
> if the plugin name changed, then yes, you need to uninstall the old plugin.
> alternatively, it may just be that kbuidsycoca4 needs to be run. in any
> case,
> take a look at what is in ~/.kde/share/kde4/services. the entries for the
> various items shoudl be there.
>
> thank you :D i felt lost r
>
> what i would like we end up with is auto generated html instead of copying
> and
> paste every single one in techbase ;)
Hello, i have create an api tool for the components. You can download it
from here
http://quickgit.kde.org/?p=scratch%2Ftsiapaliokas%2Fqml-api.git&a=summary
There is a "REA
On Wednesday, December 21, 2011 11:45:16 Martin =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Gr=E4=DFlin?=
wrote:
> Am 21.12.2011 11:20, schrieb Aaron J. Seigo:
> > hi :)
> >
> > some of you will have noticed that there is now a KDE/4.8 branch in
> > the
> > modules. i would like to request that all fixes happen in the KDE/4.
Am 21.12.2011 11:20, schrieb Aaron J. Seigo:
hi :)
some of you will have noticed that there is now a KDE/4.8 branch in
the
modules. i would like to request that all fixes happen in the KDE/4.8
branch
and then:
* if kde-workspace, cherry-pick into master
* otherwise, merge origin/KDE/4.8 into
hi :)
some of you will have noticed that there is now a KDE/4.8 branch in the
modules. i would like to request that all fixes happen in the KDE/4.8 branch
and then:
* if kde-workspace, cherry-pick into master
* otherwise, merge origin/KDE/4.8 into master
if the merge fails, then you can resort
On Monday, December 19, 2011 09:25:41 sujith h wrote:
> Are you trying to access remote site or local host? I had not done anything
> for
> local host. If you are trying to access the remote host, can you please
> share the URL for that, so that I can also try.
did some looking into this today. t
On Tuesday, December 20, 2011 11:10:13 Nowardev-Team wrote:
> i have created a Remove panels but it is shown like 1_Remove panel that was
> the name i given to it before
> and even gnome2 is lowercase
>
> :S i have to remove something ?
if the plugin name changed, then yes, you need to uninstall
On Wednesday 21 December 2011, Giorgos Tsiapaliwkas wrote:
> Should i convert the doc into mediawiki style?
this is a topic of discussion.
maybe that could help anyways.
what i would like we end up with is auto generated html instead of copying and
paste every single one in techbase ;)
--
Mar
this is my last email on the matter as i refuse to allow "decision by endless
discussion" and acceptable means of resolution have been put forward.
On Wednesday, December 21, 2011 00:51:45 Alexey Chernov wrote:
> > plasmoids, including the tasks plasmoid (and that's ended up turning out
> > rathe
24 matches
Mail list logo
