---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/104413/#review11895
---
This review has been submitted with commit
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/104413/#review11896
---
This review has been submitted with commit
On Monday, March 26, 2012 23:36:01 Marco Martin wrote:
On Monday 26 March 2012, Lamarque V. Souza wrote:
Em Wednesday 18 January 2012, Marco Martin escreveu:
I'm happy to announce
http://api.kde.org/4.x-api/plasma-qml-apidocs/
What happened with the documentation? It is reduced
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/104417/#review11899
---
Excuse my naivity here, but how does this make sense? If a
On March 27, 2012, 9:56 a.m., Sebastian Kügler wrote:
Excuse my naivity here, but how does this make sense? If a user asks to
make certain data private, he expects them to be not available in
unencrypted fashion anymore. Copying to the encrypted folder doesn't solve
this, as the file
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/104417/#review11903
---
Hm, moving a .desktop file seems wrong to me in any case, that
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/104417/
---
(Updated March 27, 2012, 2:22 p.m.)
Review request for KDE Runtime and
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/104417/#review11909
---
Does the new patch actually *silently* skip move impossible
On March 27, 2012, 2:30 p.m., Thomas Lübking wrote:
Does the new patch actually *silently* skip move impossible attempts??
Excuse my ignorance, but why are system resources actually needed to be
*moved* anywhere by a random user - what means they're now gone in their
original location
On March 27, 2012, 2:30 p.m., Thomas Lübking wrote:
Does the new patch actually *silently* skip move impossible attempts??
Excuse my ignorance, but why are system resources actually needed to be
*moved* anywhere by a random user - what means they're now gone in their
original location
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/104428/
---
Review request for Plasma and Ivan Čukić.
Description
---
(follows
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/104428/#review11918
---
- makis marimpis
On March 27, 2012, 6:36 p.m., makis
On March 27, 2012, 2:30 p.m., Thomas Lübking wrote:
Does the new patch actually *silently* skip move impossible attempts??
Excuse my ignorance, but why are system resources actually needed to be
*moved* anywhere by a random user - what means they're now gone in their
original location
On March 27, 2012, 2:30 p.m., Thomas Lübking wrote:
Does the new patch actually *silently* skip move impossible attempts??
Excuse my ignorance, but why are system resources actually needed to be
*moved* anywhere by a random user - what means they're now gone in their
original location
On March 27, 2012, 2:30 p.m., Thomas Lübking wrote:
Does the new patch actually *silently* skip move impossible attempts??
Excuse my ignorance, but why are system resources actually needed to be
*moved* anywhere by a random user - what means they're now gone in their
original location
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/104431/
---
Review request for Plasma.
Description
---
* Remove runner from
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/104406/#review11935
---
This review has been submitted with commit
17 matches
Mail list logo
