On Monday 04 June 2012, Björn Balazs wrote:
Aaron, all,
thanks for your mail. It is good to adress these kinds of worries directly
- and before the survey gets started. I actually get confronted with them
often in my work.
I personally think we do not need to worry. In most projects I
On Mon, Jun 4, 2012 at 7:59 PM, Aaron J. Seigo ase...@kde.org wrote:
On Monday, June 4, 2012 14:51:14 Myriam Schweingruber wrote:
Heya Plasma developers,
This mail just to give you a little heads up on what has been done:
As you can see for yourself in the bugzilla statistics [1], you
On Tuesday 05 June 2012, Thijs Heus wrote:
I've just created a '4.9 regressions' search list that are contain all
the
bugs that are valid against 4.9, but not against 4.8. Some of them, most
notably the weather plasmoid and the battery plasmoid, are already getting
some duplicates - so
Marco, all,
Am Dienstag, 5. Juni 2012, 10:01:44 schrieb Marco Martin:
On Monday 04 June 2012, Björn Balazs wrote:
Aaron, all,
thanks for your mail. It is good to adress these kinds of worries directly
- and before the survey gets started. I actually get confronted with them
often in
On Monday 04 June 2012, Ivan Čukić wrote:
:D )
:
- visually connecting the popups with the applets
example: http://kde-look.org/CONTENT/content-pre1/53086-1.png
or a 'triangle' pointing to the applet or anything else that people
can devise
(yeah, this is my main issue)
On Tuesday 05 June 2012, Björn Balazs wrote:
Nobody ever suggested to do a user-led approach, to stick in the
terminology of the article. Even though I have a somewhat more
differentiated view on the topic than it is been layed out in the article,
the main points are correct (ok, the article
On Tue, Jun 5, 2012 at 11:20 AM, Marco Martin notm...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tuesday 05 June 2012, Thijs Heus wrote:
I've just created a '4.9 regressions' search list that are contain all
the
bugs that are valid against 4.9, but not against 4.8. Some of them, most
notably the weather
On Tuesday 05 June 2012, Thijs Heus wrote:
the unfortunate part of this problem is that there is no -legal- way
around (while there would be plenty of -technical- ways around ;)
With 'dealt with' I did not per se mean 'resolve' ;)... The funny thing is
though that the weather forcast
another thing that i wish it was possible that is a bit troublesome at the
moment is a thing like this part of the mockup that i have not (yet) posted:
http://wstaw.org/m/2012/06/05/plasma-desktoprK3844.png
This is not that different to the 3D dock. It just needs some
contextual information to
2012/6/5 Marco Martin notm...@gmail.com:
On Tuesday 05 June 2012, Björn Balazs wrote:
Nobody ever suggested to do a user-led approach, to stick in the
terminology of the article. Even though I have a somewhat more
differentiated view on the topic than it is been layed out in the article,
the
Hey,
On Tuesday, June 05, 2012 13:31:44 Dario Freddi wrote:
This mail was originally born as a reply to the survey thread, but it
eventually drifted into something bigger which probably deserved his
own thread.
First of all I'd like to speak both with a Plasma hat (which I think I
always
On Tuesday, May 29, 2012 21:37:42 Mark wrote:
Seriously, thank you for the information. That little piece of vital
information was missing on the wiki. I added it:
http://techbase.kde.org/Development/Tutorials/Plasma/QML/API#Dialog though
you probably want to make it more acurate.
Stating the
On Tuesday 05 June 2012, Sebastian Kügler wrote:
Starting from the very beginning, I honestly can't understand the
arguments about we already have a vision. Assume this is true - this
vision was created (and eventually evolved) over the last, I think
now, 3 years. Maybe a bit more maybe a
On Monday, June 4, 2012 23:57:22 Björn Balazs wrote:
What I try to do with this survey, is to ask users / the community to report
about their life - or to stay in the picture: let them imagine where the
bridge could be built and how the existence of the bridge would change
their life.
and
On Monday, June 4, 2012 22:49:35 Alex Fiestas wrote:
Tokamak 5 is (wrongly?) understood as the Plasma team sprint, this sprint is
not only about plasma but instead about How we move the workspace
forward. It is actually closer to the Active sprint.
Tokamak, or any sprint, is what we make it.
On Monday, June 4, 2012 23:32:08 Alex Fiestas wrote:
On Monday, June 04, 2012 11:00:56 PM Sebastian Kügler wrote:
That might come as a surprise, but
Plasma == Active
Making a difference between those (and the KDE workspace) only makes sense
in a
On Tuesday, June 5, 2012 11:23:15 Björn Balazs wrote:
We - as the designers and creators of KDE - will have to understand and
believe what people say. And we will use only what makes sense to us to
create a vision, personas, etc - and at the end software.
you can't make sense of something for
On Tue, Jun 5, 2012 at 1:28 PM, Sebastian Kügler se...@kde.org wrote:
On Tuesday, May 29, 2012 21:37:42 Mark wrote:
Seriously, thank you for the information. That little piece of vital
information was missing on the wiki. I added it:
2012/6/5 Aaron J. Seigo ase...@kde.org:
On Monday, June 4, 2012 23:32:08 Alex Fiestas wrote:
On Monday, June 04, 2012 11:00:56 PM Sebastian Kügler wrote:
That might come as a surprise, but
Plasma == Active
Making a difference between those (and the
On Tuesday, June 05, 2012 14:57:42 Mark wrote:
On Tue, Jun 5, 2012 at 1:28 PM, Sebastian Kügler se...@kde.org wrote:
On Tuesday, May 29, 2012 21:37:42 Mark wrote:
Seriously, thank you for the information. That little piece of vital
information was missing on the wiki. I added it:
Hi all,
I am a Rosa Linux developer. Recently we implemented Drag-and-Drop mechanism
for StackFolder and would like to know chances to include StackFolder in KDE
4.9.
Regards,
Ural Mullabaev
Rosa Laboratory
www.rosalab.com
___
Plasma-devel mailing
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/105139/
---
(Updated June 5, 2012, 1:42 p.m.)
Review request for kwin, Plasma and
On Tuesday 05 June 2012 14:21:23 Marco Martin wrote:
What could be a nice idea in the sprint, is a short session with a debate
(maybe even moderated by someone, almost in talk-show style :p) on this very
same topic: why stopping to consider the desktop a special thing is
right? why is wrong?
Hi Ural,
On Tuesday, June 05, 2012 17:19:46 Ural Mullabaev wrote:
I am a Rosa Linux developer. Recently we implemented Drag-and-Drop mechanism
for StackFolder and would like to know chances to include StackFolder in
KDE 4.9.
For new features, it is unfortunately too late. We're already past
On Tuesday 05 June 2012, Sebastian Kügler wrote:
It would be good if you posted your patches / code to
http://reviewboard.kde.org, so we can have a look and judge about its
inclusion and into which release.
In general, we're very welcoming to new and cool Plasma addons, we just
need to
After treading the whole thread, it seems that there are people concern that
the survey can do more bad than good, at least when it comes to the whole
workspace.
Maybe we can do a hang out (G+ thing) to sort thigns out? emails are shitty
medium to talk these things and come to an agreetment.
On Tuesday 05 June 2012, Sebastian Kügler wrote:
It would be good if you posted your patches / code to
http://reviewboard.kde.org, so we can have a look and judge about
its
inclusion and into which release.
In general, we're very welcoming to new and cool Plasma addons, we
just
On Tue, Jun 5, 2012 at 7:09 PM, Ural Mullabaev ural.mullab...@rosalab.ruwrote:
Yes, StackFolder is an independent applet and placed in a playground repo
(https://projects.kde.org/projects/playground/base/stackfolder). It was
announced by Denis Koryavov in the kde-devel mailing list with
On Tue, Jun 5, 2012 at 7:09 PM, Ural Mullabaev
ural.mullab...@rosalab.ru wrote:
Yes, StackFolder is an independent applet and placed in a playground
repo
( https://projects.kde.org/projects/playground/base/stackfolder ). It
was announced by Denis Koryavov in the kde-devel mailing
On Tue, Jun 5, 2012 at 2:21 PM, Marco Martin notm...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tuesday 05 June 2012, Sebastian Kügler wrote:
Starting from the very beginning, I honestly can't understand the
arguments about we already have a vision. Assume this is true - this
vision was created (and eventually
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/105032/#review14440
---
Looks good to me.
Will let someone from Plasma (sebas
31 matches
Mail list logo
