[KDE Bugtracking System] REMINDER: current Plasma regressions

2012-07-27 Thread bugzilla_noreply
Please find below a list of the current regressions reported for Plasma This search was scheduled by myr...@kde.org. Plasma regressions -- Bug 291676: https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=291676 Priority: NOR Severity: normal Platform: Gentoo Packages Assignee: plasma-b

Re: Review Request: increased binary clock applet minimum size

2012-07-27 Thread Reza Shah
> On July 27, 2012, 9:17 p.m., Ben Cooksley wrote: > > Has this been committed to master as well? Yes, http://commits.kde.org/kdeplasma-addons/a333b14dac7323f5a84d79835548c11ae067667f - Reza --- This is an automatically generated e-mail

Re: Review Request: increased binary clock applet minimum size

2012-07-27 Thread Ben Cooksley
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/105577/#review16554 --- Has this been committed to master as well? - Ben Cooksley On

Re: Review Request: increased binary clock applet minimum size

2012-07-27 Thread Commit Hook
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/105577/#review16552 --- This review has been submitted with commit 0e46db54c504e08f3db

Re: Review Request: increased binary clock applet minimum size

2012-07-27 Thread Marco Martin
> On July 27, 2012, 7:41 p.m., Marco Martin wrote: > > Ship It! > > Reza Shah wrote: > Other than master. Is it ok to push to 4.9.0? Or should go to 4.9.1? KDE/4.9 branch is fine, yes - Marco --- This is an automatically generated

Re: Review Request: increased binary clock applet minimum size

2012-07-27 Thread Reza Shah
> On July 27, 2012, 7:41 p.m., Marco Martin wrote: > > Ship It! Other than master. Is it ok to push to 4.9.0? Or should go to 4.9.1? - Reza --- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r

Re: Review Request: increased binary clock applet minimum size

2012-07-27 Thread Marco Martin
> On July 26, 2012, 10:23 a.m., Marco Martin wrote: > > it should depend from the border size as well. > > right now it would break panels less that 40 px tall. > > Reza Shah wrote: > My patch only for placement at desktop. > Does it also affect the placement at panel? yeah, in this ca

Re: Review Request: increased binary clock applet minimum size

2012-07-27 Thread Marco Martin
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/105577/#review16546 --- Ship it! Ship It! - Marco Martin On July 15, 2012, 12:19 p.

Re: Review Request: increased binary clock applet minimum size

2012-07-27 Thread Reza Shah
> On July 26, 2012, 10:23 a.m., Marco Martin wrote: > > it should depend from the border size as well. > > right now it would break panels less that 40 px tall. My patch only for placement at desktop. Does it also affect the placement at panel? - Reza ---

Re: Review Request: Make the Nepomuk runner forward all the nie:urls

2012-07-27 Thread Vishesh Handa
> On July 27, 2012, 7:43 a.m., Sebastian Trueg wrote: > > Ship It! @Release Team: May I? - Vishesh --- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/105738/#review16511

Re: Review Request: Make the Nepomuk runner forward all the nie:urls

2012-07-27 Thread Sebastian Trueg
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/105738/#review16511 --- Ship it! Ship It! - Sebastian Trueg On July 26, 2012, 5:25