Hi,
I managed to test my patch for color and pattern wallpaper in multi
monitor setup with different resolution.
The pattern wallpaper has proper result compared the color wallpaper.
I think, i miss understood the kephal::primaryScreen function in color
wallpaper so the result was not correct(both
> On Oct. 8, 2012, 5:31 p.m., Martin Gräßlin wrote:
> > just an idea: what about hiding the whole X screen saver stuff behind
> > another configure dialog. Looking at the screenshot I find the design puts
> > emphasis on the wrong part: what we want to remove takes more than 50 % of
> > the av
> On Oct. 8, 2012, 5:31 p.m., Martin Gräßlin wrote:
> > just an idea: what about hiding the whole X screen saver stuff behind
> > another configure dialog. Looking at the screenshot I find the design puts
> > emphasis on the wrong part: what we want to remove takes more than 50 % of
> > the av
On Monday 08 October 2012 21:21:42 Antonis Tsiapaliokas wrote:
> > [*] even better is it to create a new branch for each of your bug
> > fixes/features.
>
> good idea. But (if we do something like that) i think that all those
> bug fixes should have a
> standard prefix. Otherwise someone might get
> [*] even better is it to create a new branch for each of your bug
> fixes/features.
good idea. But (if we do something like that) i think that all those
bug fixes should have a
standard prefix. Otherwise someone might get lost with the git branch -a
As regards the bugfixes, is it possible to ad
> On Oct. 8, 2012, 5:31 p.m., Martin Gräßlin wrote:
> > just an idea: what about hiding the whole X screen saver stuff behind
> > another configure dialog. Looking at the screenshot I find the design puts
> > emphasis on the wrong part: what we want to remove takes more than 50 % of
> > the av
> On Oct. 8, 2012, 5:31 p.m., Martin Gräßlin wrote:
> > just an idea: what about hiding the whole X screen saver stuff behind
> > another configure dialog. Looking at the screenshot I find the design puts
> > emphasis on the wrong part: what we want to remove takes more than 50 % of
> > the av
> On Oct. 8, 2012, 3:50 p.m., Jeremy Paul Whiting wrote:
> > That looks a bit better in my opinion. I would change/fix the wording for
> > the dashboard screen locker a bit "Click configure to find more about it!"
> > doesn't sound quite right for a tooltip, maybe something like "Click the
>
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/106768/#review20087
---
just an idea: what about hiding the whole X screen saver stuff
> On Oct. 8, 2012, 3:50 p.m., Jeremy Paul Whiting wrote:
> > That looks a bit better in my opinion. I would change/fix the wording for
> > the dashboard screen locker a bit "Click configure to find more about it!"
> > doesn't sound quite right for a tooltip, maybe something like "Click the
>
> On Oct. 8, 2012, 3:50 p.m., Jeremy Paul Whiting wrote:
> > That looks a bit better in my opinion. I would change/fix the wording for
> > the dashboard screen locker a bit "Click configure to find more about it!"
> > doesn't sound quite right for a tooltip, maybe something like "Click the
>
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/106768/#review20082
---
That looks a bit better in my opinion. I would change/fix the
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/106768/
---
Review request for Plasma and KDE Usability.
Description
---
After co
On Monday 08 October 2012 16:51:10 Aaron J. Seigo wrote:
> hi :)
>
> i just finished backporting a number of commits from KDE/4.9 into master in
> kde-runtime/plasma/
>
> when pushing fixes into master, as long as they are not large changes that
> may possibly lead to problems, please be sure the
On Monday, 2012-10-08, Mark wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 8, 2012 at 3:09 AM, David Edmundson
> > It's already fragmented it seems.
> > http://debarshiray.wordpress.com/2012/10/06/goa-why-it-is-the-way-it-is/
>
> I can't say that it surprises me.. Though i would have hoped
> otherwise. On the other hand i
hi :)
i just finished backporting a number of commits from KDE/4.9 into master in
kde-runtime/plasma/
when pushing fixes into master, as long as they are not large changes that may
possibly lead to problems, please be sure they also land in the current
*stable* branch as well. or even better y
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/106267/#review20076
---
This review has been submitted with commit
a9d88406e9b5e851a03
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/106766/#review20074
---
Ship it!
Ship It!
- Aaron J. Seigo
On Oct. 8, 2012, 1:06 p.
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/106767/#review20073
---
Ship it!
Ship It!
- Aaron J. Seigo
On Oct. 8, 2012, 1:17 p.
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/106716/#review20071
---
Ship it!
Ship It!
- Marco Martin
On Oct. 8, 2012, 1:27 p.m.
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/106716/
---
(Updated Oct. 8, 2012, 1:27 p.m.)
Review request for Plasma.
Changes
---
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/106767/
---
Review request for Plasma.
Description
---
open plasmate-> load a pro
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/106766/
---
(Updated Oct. 8, 2012, 1:06 p.m.)
Review request for Plasma and Marco Mart
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/106766/
---
Review request for Plasma and Marco Martin.
Description
---
I tried t
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/106754/#review20067
---
This review has been submitted with commit
4352f477117c884d268
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/106754/#review20059
---
Ship it!
Ship It!
- Marco Martin
On Oct. 8, 2012, 9:54 a.m.
> On Oct. 8, 2012, 9:52 a.m., Aaron J. Seigo wrote:
> > any application which expects the user to access files on disk but does not
> > provide a clear representation of mounted / removable devices is broken.
> > there's no point in degrading our own primary UI for such fixable
> > brokenness.
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/106754/
---
(Updated Oct. 8, 2012, 9:54 a.m.)
Review request for Plasma and Marco Mart
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/106755/#review20057
---
any application which expects the user to access files on disk
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/106755/
---
(Updated Oct. 8, 2012, 9:31 a.m.)
Review request for KDE Base Apps and Pla
On Monday 08 October 2012, Aaron J. Seigo wrote:
> > :)
> > :http://debarshiray.wordpress.com/2012/10/06/goa-why-it-is-the-way-it-is
> > :/
> >
> > read "The Split" section. It sums up a few reasons.
>
> i'm more interested in the reasons raised at the Active sprint.
>
I don't know much about i
On Monday, October 8, 2012 09:34:41 Mark wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 8, 2012 at 9:31 AM, Aaron J. Seigo wrote:
> > On Monday, October 8, 2012 02:50:57 Alex Fiestas wrote:
> >> This project came out at the last Active sprint, at least 2 people there
> >> mentioned that the MeeGo system wasn't something we
On Mon, Oct 8, 2012 at 9:31 AM, Aaron J. Seigo wrote:
> On Monday, October 8, 2012 02:50:57 Alex Fiestas wrote:
>> This project came out at the last Active sprint, at least 2 people there
>> mentioned that the MeeGo system wasn't something we wanted to keep.
>
> Could someone share what the reason
On Monday, October 8, 2012 02:50:57 Alex Fiestas wrote:
> This project came out at the last Active sprint, at least 2 people there
> mentioned that the MeeGo system wasn't something we wanted to keep.
Could someone share what the reasoning was?
--
Aaron J. Seigo
signature.asc
Description: This
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/106754/#review20051
---
Ship it!
looks functional.
plasma/generic/wallpapers/color/b
On Monday, October 8, 2012 02:09:23 David Edmundson wrote:
> It's already fragmented it seems.
> http://debarshiray.wordpress.com/2012/10/06/goa-why-it-is-the-way-it-is/
that's just GNOME doing their own thing, as they usually do, and that blog
entry is sharing their justification for doing so in
On Mon, Oct 8, 2012 at 3:09 AM, David Edmundson
wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 8, 2012 at 1:50 AM, Alex Fiestas wrote:
>> On Monday 08 October 2012 01:46:40 Aaron J. Seigo wrote:
>>> On Sunday, October 7, 2012 23:10:47 Mark wrote:
>>> > This page has a bit more info then the google code link (and the
>>> >
37 matches
Mail list logo
