On Sunday 30 June 2013 22:48:50 Ivan Čukić wrote:
> > > +1 ABI should be the same in both versions (unlike gcc's std::list iirc)
> >
> > Just wondering, was this email as "OK, I see where you come from", or was
> > it
> I think we should discuss this at Akademy (with Aaron, Martin and Marco as a
>
On Saturday, June 29, 2013 11:34:02 Gerd Fleischer wrote:
> I have a problem with the content of qml plasmoid displayed outside the
> widget.
>
> The code is in
> git://anongit.kde.org/scratch/geflei/plasmoid-capslockinfo.git
>
> I use setLayout() with a qgraphicslinearlayout.
> Also tried vario
> > +1 ABI should be the same in both versions (unlike gcc's std::list iirc)
>
> Just wondering, was this email as "OK, I see where you come from", or was it
I think we should discuss this at Akademy (with Aaron, Martin and Marco as a
minimal WG).
I'd separate the discussion in three parts tha
Hello,
On Saturday 29 June 2013 18:51:38 Ivan Čukić wrote:
> > > I don't agree that these /additional/ features are about the api.
> > > is an (IMO) immensely useful, especially with lambdas and
> > > std::bind for actual non exposed parts.
> >
> > Well, yes that's all useful. That's the type of
data engines do not have cascaded or unclutter operations .May be a
javascript function shall help ?
On Sun, Jun 30, 2013 at 4:44 PM, Marco Martin wrote:
> On Saturday 29 June 2013, Heena Mahour wrote:
> > Hi,
> > Hi I have two doubts
> > 1) Is the cascade ,unclutter action working in c++ win
On Saturday 29 June 2013, Heena Mahour wrote:
> Hi,
> Hi I have two doubts
> 1) Is the cascade ,unclutter action working in c++ window list?
yep, working here
> 2) How can it be implemented in QML using dataengine since these do not
> involve a particular window?
should be implemented as serv
