On Sat, Jan 2, 2021 at 2:07 AM David Edmundson
wrote:
>
> It does. I've tried to collect some stats and provide some context on
> the change.
>
> Taking just plasma-workspace, we have a lot of lines over 100
> characters at the moment.
> 3817 lines to be exact. ~3.3% [1]
> We also have 146 lines
It does. I've tried to collect some stats and provide some context on
the change.
Taking just plasma-workspace, we have a lot of lines over 100
characters at the moment.
3817 lines to be exact. ~3.3% [1]
We also have 146 lines over 160 chars. One is 383 chars long!
When the limit was 100 we had
Looks like you managed.
If you haven't managed to subscribe, you can find everything you need
at: https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/plasma-devel
David
On Fri, Jan 1, 2021 at 6:04 PM Kai Uwe Broulik wrote:
>
> Setting it the column width too narrow makes it have the habit of
> pointlessly breaking statements apart a lot.
Is this a counter-argument to something I said?
If you feel that way (I wouldn't) it does not resolve the
contradiction with
Setting it the column width too narrow makes it have the habit of
pointlessly breaking statements apart a lot.
Am 01.01.21 um 17:59 schrieb Roman Gilg:
> 160 chars column limit contradicts Frameworks recommendation of 100
chars.
On Fri, Jan 1, 2021 at 3:01 PM David Edmundson
wrote:
>
> There has been lots of work on this lately, especially by Alexander Lonhau.
>
> Both in the clang-format file and with some custom changes, and some
> changes throughout the code.
>
> If anyone has specific objections please be sure to
There has been lots of work on this lately, especially by Alexander Lonhau.
Both in the clang-format file and with some custom changes, and some
changes throughout the code.
If anyone has specific objections please be sure to note any specific
concerns ASAP before plasma is updated.
David
