On vrijdag 8 juni 2018 22:37:56 CEST Nate Graham wrote:
> This work is done; all the bugs and feature requests in the plasma4
> product have been closed. Hope all of your inboxes survived the onslaught!
Nice! https://bugs.kde.org/weekly-bug-summary.cgi tells me
User# Resolved
n...@kde.org
rempt added a comment.
I cannot test it since I haven't got a system with a home-built plasma
desktop, but it looks reasonable to me :-)
REPOSITORY
R120 Plasma Workspace
REVISION DETAIL
https://phabricator.kde.org/D12683
To: davidedmundson, #plasma
Cc: rempt, plasma-devel, ragreen, Pite
rempt added a comment.
This seems correct to me :-)
REPOSITORY
R120 Plasma Workspace
REVISION DETAIL
https://phabricator.kde.org/D4928
To: hein, #plasma, broulik, davidedmundson
Cc: rempt, plasma-devel, progwolff, lesliezhai, ali-mohamed, jensreuterberg,
abetts, sebas, apol
?id=360666, which is a really
critical bug that leads to dataloss, so I'm all for it.
- Boudewijn Rempt
On May 17, 2016, 1:29 p.m., Jonathan Marten wrote:
>
> ---
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply,
On Thu, 9 Jul 2015, Ben Cooksley wrote:
On Thu, Jul 9, 2015 at 7:25 PM, Boudewijn Rempt wrote:
On Wed, 8 Jul 2015, Aleix Pol wrote:
Is it public? It could be useful to see what it looks like to get an
idea...
Sure, go to phabricator.kde.org and login with your identity in the ldap
login
On Wed, 8 Jul 2015, Aleix Pol wrote:
Is it public? It could be useful to see what it looks like to get an idea...
Sure, go to phabricator.kde.org and login with your identity in the ldap
login box.
Boudewijn
___
Plasma-devel mailing list
Plasma-d
On Wed, 8 Jul 2015, Ivan Čukić wrote:
Hi all,
I find phabricator quite interesting. It is easy to use, the only big
issue I have with it is the insane naming of the tools.
Yeah, that's a point. It's all a bit too cute and punny.
Boud___
Plasma-deve
On Wed, 8 Jul 2015, Marco Martin wrote:
Some projects are trying out phabricator (looking at kactivities) how do they
find it?
Krita developers, testers and designers all feel Phabricator is pretty
fab. Newbies take to it easiliy. It takes getting used to because it's
more than a reviewboard
- see below.
libs/main/CMakeLists.txt
<http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/106714/#comment15763>
we generally put this in an if statement -- like we do for soprano.
- Boudewijn Rempt
On Oct. 3, 2012, 5:12 p.m., Ivan Čukić wrote:
>
> -
