On Thursday 07 May 2009 16:52:10 Aaron J. Seigo wrote:
> On Thursday 07 May 2009, Leonardo Franchi wrote:
> > > Yes because most of the applets, containments, shells, etc there
> > > depend on resources from kdebase-runtime.
> > > Only the script engines there
On Thursday 07 May 2009 11:48:48 Richard Dale wrote:
> On Wed, May 6, 2009 at 8:59 PM, Leonardo Franchi wrote:
> > hola folks,
> >
> > so i'm (finally) looking into adding scripted applet/dataengine support
> > to amarok. it's really easy and transparent and
On Thursday 07 May 2009 07:39:43 Andreas Stricker wrote:
> Hi
>
> >>> it would probably belong in runtime, actually.
> >>> kdebase/runtime/plasma/javascript?
>
> Yes, I'll appreciate this. This allows applications with
> Applet containers without the need for workspace.
>
> Plasma is a great Widget
On Wednesday 06 May 2009 21:54:19 Aaron J. Seigo wrote:
> On Wednesday 06 May 2009, Leonardo Franchi wrote:
> > *-bindings package. But moving the javascript dataengine to the plasma in
> > kdelibs would really be nice.
>
> it would probably belong in runtime, actually.
>
hola folks,
so i'm (finally) looking into adding scripted applet/dataengine support to
amarok. it's really easy and transparent and all of that (yay plasma!) but we
have a minor issue. we depend only on kdelibs, and the scriptengines are in
kdebase/workspace.
i understand that most of them hav
