https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=348529
Bug Janitor Service changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|NOR |HI
--
You are receiving this mail
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=348529
Johan Manuel changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||johan.man...@live.fr
--- Comment #41 from Johan
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=348529
--- Comment #40 from Chris ---
(In reply to Kai Uwe Broulik from comment #4)
> That script isn't particularly efficient.
> I like the idea of reducing the timeout for turning off the screen when it's
> locked (and/or making that a separate option since
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=348529
--- Comment #39 from mágoa mångata ---
(In reply to Chris from comment #38)
> (In reply to mágoa mångata from comment #36)
> > This bug is kind of annoying. Is there any problem about not solving it?
> > Since this is small bug. It's not resolved for 7
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=348529
--- Comment #38 from Chris ---
(In reply to mágoa mångata from comment #36)
> This bug is kind of annoying. Is there any problem about not solving it?
> Since this is small bug. It's not resolved for 7 years!
> I think the only thing to do is to add an
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=348529
--- Comment #37 from Chris ---
(In reply to Chris from comment #34)
> The script above should work nicely, but it doesn't, not consistently at
> least.
> Related bugs:
> https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=348082 "monitor is randomly powered
> back
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=348529
--- Comment #36 from mágoa mångata ---
This bug is kind of annoying. Is there any problem about not solving it? Since
this is small bug. It's not resolved for 7 years!
I think the only thing to do is to add an option for lock screen timeout in the
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=348529
Nate Graham changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||k...@sedrubal.de
--- Comment #35 from Nate
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=348529
--- Comment #34 from Chris ---
The script above should work nicely, but it doesn't, not consistently at least.
Related bugs:
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=348082 "monitor is randomly powered back
on"
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=422455
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=348529
Chris changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||inkbottle...@gmail.com
--- Comment #33 from Chris ---
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=348529
Patrick Silva changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mokazemi2...@gmail.com
--- Comment #32 from
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=348529
--- Comment #31 from Lukas Ba. ---
It's been 5 years since this bug was opened. Can we please just use the event
script solution i suggested? This should be as simple as editing some default
configuration files to add the xset commands below.
To
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=348529
Patrick Silva changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||germano.massu...@gmail.com
--- Comment #30
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=348529
Kai Uwe Broulik changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||brai1...@gmail.com
--- Comment #29 from Kai
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=348529
--- Comment #28 from goodmi...@goodmirek.com ---
(In reply to arne anka from comment #27)
> (In reply to goodmirek from comment #25)
> > (In reply to arne anka from comment #22)
> > > (In reply to goodmirek from comment #19)
> > > > arne anka: The issue
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=348529
--- Comment #27 from arne anka ---
(In reply to goodmirek from comment #25)
> (In reply to arne anka from comment #22)
> > (In reply to goodmirek from comment #19)
> > > arne anka: The issue seems to be there is not enough people able to
> > >
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=348529
--- Comment #26 from goodmi...@goodmirek.com ---
(In reply to Nate Graham from comment #24)
> *** Bug 405344 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
The bug 405344 is not a duplicate of this bug 348529, although it is related.
The bug 405344
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=348529
goodmi...@goodmirek.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Version|5.3.1 |5.15.4
--
You are receiving this
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=348529
--- Comment #25 from goodmi...@goodmirek.com ---
(In reply to arne anka from comment #22)
> (In reply to goodmirek from comment #19)
> > arne anka: The issue seems to be there is not enough people able to
> > contribute their manpower or money to buy
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=348529
--- Comment #24 from Nate Graham ---
*** Bug 405344 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=348529
--- Comment #23 from Christoph Feck ---
Comment #11 works perfect for me.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=348529
--- Comment #22 from arne anka ---
(In reply to goodmirek from comment #19)
> arne anka: The issue seems to be there is not enough people able to
> contribute their manpower or money to buy such a manpower.
> If I create an issue for this bug on
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=348529
--- Comment #21 from arne anka ---
(In reply to Kai Uwe Broulik from comment #18)
> If it were trivially implemented, I would have long done it. Feel free to
> poke the code and submit a patch, relevant code can be found in
>
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=348529
--- Comment #20 from Lukas Ba. ---
> 2.) Add option to reduce turn off timeout when screen is locked (to e.g. 30
> seconds or 1 minute) ← would be my preference
Here is how to implement this behaviour with the event workaround.
I added two commands.
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=348529
--- Comment #19 from goodmi...@goodmirek.com ---
arne anka: The issue seems to be there is not enough people able to contribute
their manpower or money to buy such a manpower.
If I create an issue for this bug on bountysource.com and add $50 bounty, how
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=348529
--- Comment #18 from Kai Uwe Broulik ---
If it were trivially implemented, I would have long done it. Feel free to poke
the code and submit a patch, relevant code can be found in
powerdevil/daemon/actions/dpms
--
You are receiving this mail because:
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=348529
arne anka changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||kde-b...@ginguppin.de
--- Comment #17 from arne
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=348529
Peter changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||pe...@ceiley.net
--- Comment #16 from Peter ---
Is
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=348529
gade...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||gade...@gmail.com
--- Comment #15 from
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=348529
--- Comment #14 from k...@web.de ---
If you set the lockscreen timeout to less than the DPMS timeout (-30s), that
effectively reduces the DPMS timeout to the lockscreen timeout (+30s), making
the DPMS timeout setting ineffective. this must somehow be
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=348529
--- Comment #13 from Martin Gräßlin ---
Some thoughts from using my system. I often listen to music provided by
the computer. The computer's audio is connected through HDMI to one of
my screens. When the screen goes into DPMS the
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=348529
Kai Uwe Broulik changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mgraess...@kde.org
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=348529
k...@web.de changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||k...@web.de
--- Comment #11 from k...@web.de ---
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=348529
--- Comment #10 from n...@leippe.com ---
My case seems to have been because of a bug in the nvidia-drivers.
https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=560774
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=348529
--- Comment #9 from n...@leippe.com ---
related to #349344 ?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
___
Plasma-devel mailing list
Plasma-devel@kde.org
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=348529
kraeuterm...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||kraeuterm...@gmail.com
--- Comment #8
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=348529
n...@leippe.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||n...@leippe.com
--- Comment #5 from
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=348529
--- Comment #7 from Rewarp rew...@thestrayworld.com ---
I have been using this script since the day I uploaded it, and on a newly
reinstalled desktop as well. I am running an ATI card using the DVI port, so
that could be the difference.
--
You are
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=348529
--- Comment #6 from n...@leippe.com ---
related to: ?
https://devtalk.nvidia.com/default/topic/791786/linux/dpms-not-working-on-gtx980-with-displayport-connection/2/
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=348529
Kai Uwe Broulik k...@privat.broulik.de changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
40 matches
Mail list logo