Re: [RFC] Invite Razor-Qt to next Workspaces Sprint

2013-02-17 Thread Aaron J. Seigo
On Sunday, February 17, 2013 08:55:38 Martin Graesslin wrote: * which pulls in Virtuoso afaict this is now the main problem. (which speak volumes to how far akonadi and nepomuk have both come in the last 2 years!) I was speaking with Georg from Kolab Systems the other day over coffee and this

Re: [RFC] Invite Razor-Qt to next Workspaces Sprint

2013-02-17 Thread Vishesh Handa
On Sun, Feb 17, 2013 at 5:04 PM, Ivan Čukić ivan.cu...@kde.org wrote: On Sunday, 17. February 2013. 12.20.00 Aaron J. Seigo wrote: On Sunday, February 17, 2013 08:55:38 Martin Graesslin wrote: * which pulls in Virtuoso Just a small off-topic here: Virtuoso *is* one of the fastest rdf

Re: [RFC] Invite Razor-Qt to next Workspaces Sprint

2013-02-17 Thread Ivan Čukić
Nepomuk in 4.10 being too slow. Whichever bottlenecks they may be, are most probably in our code. Not theirs. There are bottlenecks in nepomuk, but there are in V as well. Once upon a time, I did some benchmarks with sql (sqlite) and sparql (virtuoso/soprano) queries for the things that are

[RFC] Invite Razor-Qt to next Workspaces Sprint

2013-02-16 Thread Martin Graesslin
Hi all, I want to suggest that we invite Razor-Qt developers to our next Workspaces Sprint in Nuremberg. *Why?* At FOSDEM there was a presentation about Razor-Qt and I attended it together with many other KDE developers. For me the most important information I took out of that talk was that

Re: [RFC] Invite Razor-Qt to next Workspaces Sprint

2013-02-16 Thread Sebastian Kügler
On Saturday, February 16, 2013 16:54:03 Martin Graesslin wrote: I want to suggest that we invite Razor-Qt developers to our next Workspaces Sprint in Nuremberg. *Why?* At FOSDEM there was a presentation about Razor-Qt and I attended it together with many other KDE developers. For me the

Re: [RFC] Invite Razor-Qt to next Workspaces Sprint

2013-02-16 Thread Martin Graesslin
On Saturday 16 February 2013 18:55:17 Sebastian Kügler wrote: All good points. From my side, they're totally welcome. (I'd need to know in time in order to make space for them during the sprint.) Are you in contact with the developers already? Maybe in that case, you could ask if they're

Re: [RFC] Invite Razor-Qt to next Workspaces Sprint

2013-02-16 Thread Marco Martin
On Saturday 16 February 2013, Sebastian Kügler wrote: *Comments?* All good points. From my side, they're totally welcome. (I'd need to know in time in order to make space for them during the sprint.) Are you in contact with the developers already? Maybe in that case, you could ask if

Re: [RFC] Invite Razor-Qt to next Workspaces Sprint

2013-02-16 Thread Kevin Krammer
On Saturday, 2013-02-16, Martin Graesslin wrote: On Saturday 16 February 2013 18:55:17 Sebastian Kügler wrote: All good points. From my side, they're totally welcome. (I'd need to know in time in order to make space for them during the sprint.) Are you in contact with the developers

Re: [RFC] Invite Razor-Qt to next Workspaces Sprint

2013-02-16 Thread Aaron J. Seigo
On Saturday, February 16, 2013 16:54:03 Martin Graesslin wrote: I wouldn't call KDE Plasma lightweight indeed; those 1Ghz ARM cpus with 512MB of RAM running it are just *beasts* of the modern age I tell you. ;) razorqt may be lighter still (i haven't looked, but i can imagine all sorts of

Re: [RFC] Invite Razor-Qt to next Workspaces Sprint

2013-02-16 Thread Martin Graesslin
On Sunday 17 February 2013 02:08:57 Aaron J. Seigo wrote: On Saturday, February 16, 2013 16:54:03 Martin Graesslin wrote: I wouldn't call KDE Plasma lightweight indeed; those 1Ghz ARM cpus with 512MB of RAM running it are just *beasts* of the modern age I tell you. ;) razorqt may be