Re: 4.2: the binary compatible release

2008-10-21 Thread Stephen Kelly
Aaron J. Seigo wrote: for those wondering what binary compat means for us, in a nutshell: * we can't add new members to the public classes (the dptr makes that unecessary in the first place, of course =) Are you sure about this one? Techbase says you can:

Re: 4.2: the binary compatible release

2008-10-21 Thread Stephen Kelly
Aaron J. Seigo wrote: yes, functions or methods. not data members (which i usually shortcut to just members, versus methods ... probably what caused confusion; sorry.) You're right. I read methods instead of members. Sorry for the noise. Steve.

Re: 4.2: the binary compatible release

2008-10-20 Thread Kevin Ottens
Le Monday 20 October 2008, Aaron J. Seigo a écrit : On Sunday 19 October 2008, Kevin Ottens wrote: Le Saturday 18 October 2008, Aaron J. Seigo a écrit : * Known issues * Service additions Hm, last time I looked at it, it was ok. Did it got much changes I overlooked lately?

Re: 4.2: the binary compatible release

2008-10-20 Thread Ryan P. Bitanga
2008/10/19 Aaron J. Seigo [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Hello =) the second thing we discussed at the meeting today was moving libplasma to kdelibs and guaranteeing binary compatibility starting with 4.2. here are our notes from the meeting: Binary Compatibility and kdelibs * The Plan *

Re: 4.2: the binary compatible release

2008-10-20 Thread Marco Martin
On Monday 20 October 2008, Ryan P. Bitanga wrote: 2008/10/19 Aaron J. Seigo [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Hello =) the second thing we discussed at the meeting today was moving libplasma to kdelibs and guaranteeing binary compatibility starting with 4.2. here are our notes from the meeting:

Re: 4.2: the binary compatible release

2008-10-19 Thread Marco Martin
2008/10/19 Sebastian Kügler [EMAIL PROTECTED]: On Saturday 18 October 2008 21:50:10 Aaron J. Seigo wrote: or BorderSvg/BorderedSvg this is closer to the reality. personally i don't have a problem with PanelSvg, as i don't think there is a good name for it. it's an odd duck, and it'll have

Re: 4.2: the binary compatible release

2008-10-19 Thread Alex Merry
On Saturday 18 October 2008 20:15:03 Ivan Čukić wrote: or BorderSvg/BorderedSvg +1 Alex -- Proud KDE hacker: http://www.kde.org Get KDE 4.1 - out now! signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part. ___ Plasma-devel mailing

Re: 4.2: the binary compatible release

2008-10-19 Thread Riccardo Iaconelli
On Saturday 18 October 2008 21:15:03 Ivan Čukić wrote: BorderSvg/BorderedSvg Absolutely yes, BorderedSvg is much much better than PanelSvg. Another suggestion, FramedSvg? -Riccardo -- GPG key: 3D0F6376 When encrypting, please encrypt also for this subkey: 9EBD7FE1 - Pace Peace Paix Paz

Re: 4.2: the binary compatible release

2008-10-19 Thread Riccardo Iaconelli
On Saturday 18 October 2008 21:15:03 Ivan Čukić wrote: or BorderSvg/BorderedSvg Yet another one, StretchableSvg? -Riccardo -- GPG key: 3D0F6376 When encrypting, please encrypt also for this subkey: 9EBD7FE1 - Pace Peace Paix Paz Frieden Pax Pokój Friður Fred Béke 和平 Hasiti Lapé Hetep Malu

Re: 4.2: the binary compatible release

2008-10-19 Thread Ivan Čukić
On Sunday, 19. October 2008. 17.08:36 Riccardo Iaconelli wrote: On Saturday 18 October 2008 21:15:03 Ivan Čukić wrote: BorderSvg/BorderedSvg Absolutely yes, BorderedSvg is much much better than PanelSvg. I suggested the Border(something) because of Qt's Style Sheets. They have the border

Re: 4.2: the binary compatible release

2008-10-19 Thread Marco Martin
On Sunday 19 October 2008, Riccardo Iaconelli wrote: On Saturday 18 October 2008 21:15:03 Ivan Čukić wrote: BorderSvg/BorderedSvg Absolutely yes, BorderedSvg is much much better than PanelSvg. Another suggestion, FramedSvg? -Riccardo FrameSvg, i prefer something that describes the thing

Re: 4.2: the binary compatible release

2008-10-19 Thread Kevin Ottens
Le Saturday 18 October 2008, Aaron J. Seigo a écrit : the second thing we discussed at the meeting today was moving libplasma to kdelibs and guaranteeing binary compatibility starting with 4.2. here are our notes from the meeting: Binary Compatibility and kdelibs * The Plan *

Re: 4.2: the binary compatible release

2008-10-19 Thread Aaron J. Seigo
On Sunday 19 October 2008, Kevin Ottens wrote: Le Saturday 18 October 2008, Aaron J. Seigo a écrit : * Known issues * Service additions Hm, last time I looked at it, it was ok. Did it got much changes I overlooked lately? no, but i'll be adding hooks to remote a Service over

4.2: the binary compatible release

2008-10-18 Thread Aaron J. Seigo
Hello =) the second thing we discussed at the meeting today was moving libplasma to kdelibs and guaranteeing binary compatibility starting with 4.2. here are our notes from the meeting: Binary Compatibility and kdelibs * The Plan * libplasma, in its entirety, in kdelibs for 4.2

Re: 4.2: the binary compatible release

2008-10-18 Thread Dan Meltzer
2008/10/18 Aaron J. Seigo [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Hello =) the second thing we discussed at the meeting today was moving libplasma to kdelibs and guaranteeing binary compatibility starting with 4.2. here are our notes from the meeting: Binary Compatibility and kdelibs * The Plan *

Re: 4.2: the binary compatible release

2008-10-18 Thread Aaron J. Seigo
On Saturday 18 October 2008, Ivan Čukić wrote: StandardSvg (It is pretty much the default..) -1 confusing like the present one -1 here as well, for same reason BackgroundSvg (I don't believe its used anywhere for foreground stuffs?) +1 it's really not about backgrounds, though. it's

Re: 4.2: the binary compatible release

2008-10-18 Thread Dan Meltzer
2008/10/18 Aaron J. Seigo [EMAIL PROTECTED]: On Saturday 18 October 2008, Ivan Čukić wrote: StandardSvg (It is pretty much the default..) -1 confusing like the present one -1 here as well, for same reason BackgroundSvg (I don't believe its used anywhere for foreground stuffs?) +1

Re: 4.2: the binary compatible release

2008-10-18 Thread Sebastian Kügler
On Saturday 18 October 2008 21:50:10 Aaron J. Seigo wrote: or BorderSvg/BorderedSvg this is closer to the reality. personally i don't have a problem with PanelSvg, as i don't think there is a good name for it. it's an odd duck, and it'll have an odd duck name because of that. if those