D16861: Improve contrast for Breeze Snow and the Breeze crosshair

2018-11-13 Thread Nathaniel Graham
ngraham added a comment. Imagine that, reading the README. :) If manual work is required for each image, that seems like all the more reason to only include the two changed ones in the diff. REPOSITORY R31 Breeze REVISION DETAIL https://phabricator.kde.org/D16861 To: ndavis, #breeze, #

D16861: Improve contrast for Breeze Snow and the Breeze crosshair

2018-11-13 Thread Noah Davis
ndavis planned changes to this revision. ndavis added a comment. Hmm some of the cursors seem blurrier than they used to be and I have no idea why. REPOSITORY R31 Breeze REVISION DETAIL https://phabricator.kde.org/D16861 To: ndavis, #breeze, #vdg, #plasma, ngraham Cc: ndavis, plasma-dev

D16861: Improve contrast for Breeze Snow and the Breeze crosshair

2018-11-13 Thread Nathaniel Graham
ngraham added a comment. FWIW the actual crosshair cursors seem better to me now, especially the Breeze snow one. You could maybe just take the changed files for the crosshairs and make a new diff with just them if you can't figure out the other issue. REPOSITORY R31 Breeze REVISION DETAI

D16861: Improve contrast for Breeze Snow and the Breeze crosshair

2018-11-13 Thread Noah Davis
ndavis added a comment. I think I found the reason why the prebuilt cursor themes are included in the repo in the README: > No trimming will have been done to the cursors, and X11 *may* give you split-second glitches when switching cursors making them appear to 'jump' for an instant. To

D16861: Improve contrast for Breeze Snow and the Breeze crosshair

2018-11-13 Thread Noah Davis
ndavis added a comment. In D16861#359170 , @ngraham wrote: > So is there a script that regenerates all the X11 cursor files from the SVG whenever it's changed or something? Because I'm willing to bet you didn't change all 654 cursors...