D16995: Consider identical display models in ControlConfig

2019-06-13 Thread Roman Gilg
This revision was not accepted when it landed; it landed in state "Needs Review". This revision was automatically updated to reflect the committed changes. Closed by commit R104:153e6e5fbafa: Consider identical display models in ControlConfig (authored by romangg). REPOSITORY R104 KScreen CHA

D16995: Consider identical display models in ControlConfig

2019-06-13 Thread Roman Gilg
romangg updated this revision to Diff 59718. romangg added a comment. Rebase on series changes. CHANGES SINCE LAST UPDATE https://phabricator.kde.org/D16995?vs=59667&id=59718 BRANCH 1controlNameSpecific REVISION DETAIL https://phabricator.kde.org/D16995 AFFECTED FILES common/control

D16995: Consider identical display models in ControlConfig

2019-06-12 Thread Roman Gilg
romangg updated this revision to Diff 59667. romangg added a comment. Rebase on master. REPOSITORY R104 KScreen CHANGES SINCE LAST UPDATE https://phabricator.kde.org/D16995?vs=57833&id=59667 BRANCH 1controlNameSpecific REVISION DETAIL https://phabricator.kde.org/D16995 AFFECTED FIL

D16995: Consider identical display models in ControlConfig

2019-05-09 Thread Roman Gilg
romangg added a comment. In D16995#462174 , @romangg wrote: > If there is no control file, the output retention falls back to global. If there is no global file we set some default values. It should instead take the ones from the config file. By

D16995: Consider identical display models in ControlConfig

2019-05-09 Thread Roman Gilg
romangg updated this revision to Diff 57833. romangg added a comment. Rebase on series changes. REPOSITORY R104 KScreen CHANGES SINCE LAST UPDATE https://phabricator.kde.org/D16995?vs=57718&id=57833 BRANCH 1controlNameSpecific REVISION DETAIL https://phabricator.kde.org/D16995 AFFE

D16995: Consider identical display models in ControlConfig

2019-05-07 Thread Roman Gilg
romangg added a comment. In D16995#364739 , @mart wrote: > does this cause incompatibilities with old configs? No, this is only about the new control files. Config files already differentiate between different connectors. But after thinki

D16995: Consider identical display models in ControlConfig

2019-05-07 Thread Roman Gilg
romangg updated this revision to Diff 57718. romangg added a comment. Rebase on series changes. REPOSITORY R104 KScreen CHANGES SINCE LAST UPDATE https://phabricator.kde.org/D16995?vs=57667&id=57718 BRANCH 1controlNameSpecific REVISION DETAIL https://phabricator.kde.org/D16995 AFFE

D16995: Consider identical display models in ControlConfig

2019-05-06 Thread Roman Gilg
romangg updated this revision to Diff 57667. romangg added a comment. Rebase on series changes. REPOSITORY R104 KScreen CHANGES SINCE LAST UPDATE https://phabricator.kde.org/D16995?vs=45766&id=57667 BRANCH 1controlNameSpecific REVISION DETAIL https://phabricator.kde.org/D16995 AFFE

D16995: Consider identical display models in ControlConfig

2018-11-23 Thread Marco Martin
mart added a comment. does this cause incompatibilities with old configs? REPOSITORY R104 KScreen REVISION DETAIL https://phabricator.kde.org/D16995 To: romangg, #plasma Cc: mart, plasma-devel, ragreen, Pitel, ZrenBot, lesliezhai, ali-mohamed, jensreuterberg, abetts, sebas, apol

D16995: Consider identical display models in ControlConfig

2018-11-18 Thread Roman Gilg
romangg created this revision. romangg added a reviewer: Plasma. Herald added a project: Plasma. Herald added a subscriber: plasma-devel. romangg requested review of this revision. REVISION SUMMARY Load the correct control information in configurations with identical displays having the same E