On Friday 20 July 2012 01:31:23 you wrote:
Well yes, but i don't mean to develop a separate runner, just add chrome
support to the existing one (which already supports Firefox and Opera too).
And yes, i saw a chrome runner too, but it's a standalone runner. I'll
probably still look at it, but
On Fri, Jul 20, 2012 at 11:50 AM, Alex Fiestas afies...@kde.org wrote:
If it's ok I can start pushing refactored code to master starting
tomorrow.
That was fast! :p
I was in Tibet the last 4 years, i learned some secret refactoring
tecniques :P Also, these two days i don't have much stuff
On Fri, Jul 20, 2012 at 8:07 PM, Marco Gulino marco.gul...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Jul 20, 2012 at 11:50 AM, Alex Fiestas afies...@kde.org wrote:
If it's ok I can start pushing refactored code to master starting
tomorrow.
That was fast! :p
I was in Tibet the last 4 years, i learned
Thank you, but this proxy is kinda too much restrictive, i can use https,
but ssh on https port doesn't seem to work.
Anyway, not a big deal... in a few hours i'll be on holiday for a whole
month, no proxy or firewalls in the way :)
On Fri, Jul 20, 2012 at 1:11 PM, Ben Cooksley bcooks...@kde.org
Ok, pushed
branch is plasma/bookmarksrunner-chrome-gulino (based on 4.9, will forward
port to master after the review).
Basically i extracted major responsibilities into separate classes, created
an interface Browser, and added Chrome/Chromium support via QJson (should
it be an optional
Hello!
As i've been suggested, forwarding my previous mail in here, since i'm
working on plasma files.
Thanks
Marco
-- Forwarded message --
From: Marco Gulino marco.gul...@gmail.com
Date: Thu, Jul 19, 2012 at 9:43 AM
Subject: back developing [KRunner Bookmarks for chrome]
To:
You don't need a branch to develop a runner, you can actually do it in a
separate repo, maybe a kde scratch ?
Something tells me that I have seen a chrome bookmark runner before... but
maybe I'm wrong (for sure I have seen the firefox one).
Cheerz !
Well yes, but i don't mean to develop a separate runner, just add chrome
support to the existing one (which already supports Firefox and Opera too).
And yes, i saw a chrome runner too, but it's a standalone runner. I'll
probably still look at it, but the main point is to refactor the existing
one
