On Sat, Apr 2, 2011 at 4:20 AM, Marco Martin wrote:
> On Friday 01 April 2011, todd rme wrote:
>> I think you are misunderstanding my suggestion. The suggestion is
>> that, as part of the QMLifying of the kickoff widget, you first create
>> separate widgets for each of the kickoff tabs, then use
On Friday 01 April 2011, todd rme wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 1, 2011 at 9:36 AM, Viranch Mehta
wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > On Thu, Mar 31, 2011 at 11:51 PM, todd rme wrote:
> >> kickoff? I personally would like having a favorites or places widget.
> >
> > Oh that's a good idea. I've actually wanted to h
On Fri, Apr 1, 2011 at 9:36 AM, Viranch Mehta wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Thu, Mar 31, 2011 at 11:51 PM, todd rme wrote:
>>
>> kickoff? I personally would like having a favorites or places widget.
>
> Oh that's a good idea. I've actually wanted to have places plasmoid since
> long. But I want to first c
Hi,
On Thu, Mar 31, 2011 at 11:51 PM, todd rme wrote:
> kickoff? I personally would like having a favorites or places widget.
>
> Oh that's a good idea. I've actually wanted to have places plasmoid since
long. But I want to first complete the default plasmoids in this GSoC, and
then move on to
On Thu, Mar 31, 2011 at 8:35 AM, Artur de Souza wrote:
>
> Quoting Marco Martin :
>> to me the proposal seems quite good now
>
> +1.
>
> I would only change to make kickoff one of the last ones. I didn't
> touch kickoff's code, but maybe it's a little complex and it's better
> to finish others tha
Hi,
On Thu, Mar 31, 2011 at 6:05 PM, Artur de Souza wrote:
>
> Quoting Marco Martin :
> > to me the proposal seems quite good now
>
> +1.
>
> I would only change to make kickoff one of the last ones. I didn't
> touch kickoff's code, but maybe it's a little complex and it's better
> to finish oth
Quoting Marco Martin :
> to me the proposal seems quite good now
+1.
I would only change to make kickoff one of the last ones. I didn't
touch kickoff's code, but maybe it's a little complex and it's better
to finish others that are simpler first?
Cheers,
--
---
On Thu, Mar 31, 2011 at 9:42 AM, Viranch Mehta wrote:
> Hi,
> I have modified my proposal according to the feedbacks. Please review the
> final version:
> https://docs.google.com/document/d/19zZn2ObkGWFRVOjaaVu1qp54Olb7g50FN6RgyAQhFm0/edit?hl=en&authkey=CKPlh6oP
> Thanks,
> Viranch
to me the prop
Hi,
I have modified my proposal according to the feedbacks. Please review the
final version:
https://docs.google.com/document/d/19zZn2ObkGWFRVOjaaVu1qp54Olb7g50FN6RgyAQhFm0/edit?hl=en&authkey=CKPlh6oP
Thanks,
Viranch
___
Plasma-devel mailing list
Plasma
Hi Marco,
On Mon, Mar 28, 2011 at 5:03 PM, Marco Martin wrote:
> please also state that you will work together whoever will write the plasma
> qtcomponents set (hope there will be a separate gsoc for that, could end up
> be
> necessary you to work also on them...)
>
>
Could you please give me so
Hi Viranch,
On Tuesday, March 29, 2011 16:39:10 Viranch Mehta wrote:> On Tue, Mar 29, 2011
at 3:20 PM, Sebastian Kügler wrote:
> > I thin the focus should be on:
> >
> > - Port Plasmoids visual appearance and interaction to QML and JavaScript
> >
> > This tempts me to mention about QGraphicsVi
Hi Sebas,
On Tue, Mar 29, 2011 at 3:20 PM, Sebastian Kügler wrote:
> I thin the focus should be on:
>
> - Port Plasmoids visual appearance and interaction to QML and JavaScript
>
> This tempts me to mention about QGraphicsView (so that it is specifically
clear that from what the plasmoids are go
Hi Viranch,
On Monday, March 28, 2011 13:07:39 Viranch Mehta wrote:
> Please review my proposal for GSoC project QMLify Plasmoids:
> https://docs.google.com/document/d/19zZn2ObkGWFRVOjaaVu1qp54Olb7g50FN6RgyAQ
> hFm0/edit?hl=en&authkey=CKPlh6oP
>
> I've specified the order of plasmoids that I thin
On Monday 28 March 2011, Viranch Mehta wrote:
> > please also state that you will work together whoever will write the
> > plasma qtcomponents set (hope there will be a separate gsoc for that,
> > could end up be
> > necessary you to work also on them...)
> >
> > If qtcomponents gsoc doesn't get i
On Mon, Mar 28, 2011 at 5:03 PM, Marco Martin wrote:
>
> Hi,
> the proposal is good, it should be a bit more elaborate tough.
> the "qmlfy" term was used just for fun, however the official proposal
> should
> have a bit more serious name, like "QML port of workspace and addons
> plasmoids"
>
> My
On Monday 28 March 2011, Viranch Mehta wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Please review my proposal for GSoC project QMLify Plasmoids:
> https://docs.google.com/document/d/19zZn2ObkGWFRVOjaaVu1qp54Olb7g50FN6RgyAQ
> hFm0/edit?hl=en&authkey=CKPlh6oP
>
> I've specified the order of plasmoids that I think would be app
Hi,
Please review my proposal for GSoC project QMLify Plasmoids:
https://docs.google.com/document/d/19zZn2ObkGWFRVOjaaVu1qp54Olb7g50FN6RgyAQhFm0/edit?hl=en&authkey=CKPlh6oP
I've specified the order of plasmoids that I think would be appropriate in
increasing order of complexity.
Thanks,
Viranch
17 matches
Mail list logo
