Re: Jolie and Plasma.... and Akonadi?

2009-01-28 Thread Fabrizio Montesi
Yes, I'd like that very much, as I'd like to sponsor it as the official C++ library for interacting with JOLIE during research meetings, the industry, the JOLIE website and so on... ;) We should discuss the API for that then. I'm willing to make some changes to the API of metaservice-java if we do

Re: Jolie and Plasma.... and Akonadi?

2009-01-28 Thread Aaron J. Seigo
On Wednesday 28 January 2009, Fabrizio Montesi wrote: > How does that look? quite sensible; if we keep it similar to the java classes as well then we can increase the amount of transferable knowledge betwee the systems :) -- Aaron J. Seigo humru othro a kohnu se GPG Fingerprint: 8B8B 2209 0C6F

Re: Jolie and Plasma.... and Akonadi?

2009-01-28 Thread Fabrizio Montesi
My main problem for UPnP support is time, but as I've said I'd be willing to mentor the JOLIE side of that. =) Perhaps once we get this library and some end-user benefits (like Plasma::Service integration and a plasmoid that makes use of it), we will gain enough interest and get someone to cooperat

Re: Jolie and Plasma.... and Akonadi?

2009-01-28 Thread Fabrizio Montesi
Looks like we are going to the same direction I took for giving Java support to enterprise applications italianaSoftware and eos-software are developing: metaservice-java. http://jolie.svn.sourceforge.net/viewvc/jolie/trunk/support/metaservice-java/ See the MetaService class: http://jolie.svn.sour

Re: Jolie and Plasma.... and Akonadi?

2009-01-28 Thread Kevin Ottens
On Wednesday 28 January 2009 09:33:25 Aaron J. Seigo wrote: > On Wednesday 28 January 2009, Kevin Ottens wrote: > > I somehow assumed this library would end up as some private classes in > > libplasma but perhaps it makes sense to even go for pure Qt API and for > > kdesupport to give it the chance

Re: Jolie and Plasma.... and Akonadi?

2009-01-28 Thread Aaron J. Seigo
On Wednesday 28 January 2009, Kevin Ottens wrote: > I somehow assumed this library would end up as some private classes in > libplasma but perhaps it makes sense to even go for pure Qt API and for > kdesupport to give it the chance for wider adoption? (actually that'd make i think it makes sense i

Re: Jolie and Plasma.... and Akonadi?

2009-01-27 Thread Kevin Ottens
On Tuesday 27 January 2009 20:36:10 Fabrizio Montesi wrote: > IMO the two projects could share a private library for interacting with > MetaService and use its operations. Something like: > > MetaService* s = MetaService::connect( "/tmp/metaservice_socket" ); > Job* j1 = s->addRedirection(...); > J

Re: Jolie and Plasma.... and Akonadi?

2009-01-27 Thread Fabrizio Montesi
IMO the two projects could share a private library for interacting with MetaService and use its operations. Something like: MetaService* s = MetaService::connect( "/tmp/metaservice_socket" ); Job* j1 = s->addRedirection(...); Job* j2 = s->loadEmbeddedJolieService(...); [...] For instance, by usin

Re: Jolie and Plasma.... and Akonadi?

2009-01-27 Thread Aaron J. Seigo
On Monday 26 January 2009, Fabrizio Montesi wrote: > today igorto and vkrause (akonadi people) jumped in #jolie to speak about > the possibility to integrate akonadi with Jolie. They're still > investigating, but the thing surely seem possible and sound. I think that > the best thing to do would be

Jolie and Plasma.... and Akonadi?

2009-01-26 Thread Fabrizio Montesi
Hi everyone, today igorto and vkrause (akonadi people) jumped in #jolie to speak about the possibility to integrate akonadi with Jolie. They're still investigating, but the thing surely seem possible and sound. I think that the best thing to do would be to share as much information and work as pos