On 12/09/2012 10:41, Sebastian Kügler wrote:
I don't think it's useful to engage in this discussion again.
+1 :)
Cheers,
Artur
___
Plasma-devel mailing list
Plasma-devel@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/plasma-devel
this is now my two cents to this thread: we have over-discussed this topic and
it has harmed our developer community already enough. I never ever want to
read about it again.
I think at the IRC meeting after the last discussion we agreed that we want to
put such decisions into the wiki. So I wo
On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 3:13 PM, Sebastian Kügler wrote:
> On Wednesday, September 12, 2012 13:54:34 David Edmundson wrote:
>> On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 1:41 PM, Sebastian Kügler wrote:
>> > On Wednesday, September 12, 2012 14:30:08 Marco Martin wrote:
>> >> I'm for keeping the config option as "le
On Wednesday, September 12, 2012 13:54:34 David Edmundson wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 1:41 PM, Sebastian Kügler wrote:
> > On Wednesday, September 12, 2012 14:30:08 Marco Martin wrote:
> >> I'm for keeping the config option as "least possible damage", i think it
> >> has been discussed to de
On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 1:41 PM, Sebastian Kügler wrote:
> On Wednesday, September 12, 2012 14:30:08 Marco Martin wrote:
>> I'm for keeping the config option as "least possible damage", i think it
>> has been discussed to death (including why user polls for features don't
>> work)
>
> +1
>
> I do
On Wednesday, September 12, 2012 14:30:08 Marco Martin wrote:
> I'm for keeping the config option as "least possible damage", i think it
> has been discussed to death (including why user polls for features don't
> work)
+1
I don't think it's useful to engage in this discussion again.
--
sebas
In data mercoledì 12 settembre 2012 14:30:08, Marco Martin ha scritto:
> I'm for keeping the config option as "least possible damage", i think it has
> been discussed to death (including why user polls for features don't work)
Given the amount of (heated) discussion on this topic, to be perfectly
On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 5:53 PM, Djuro Drljaca wrote:
> what about adding the option to hide or show this information?
>
> My bad, the poll is about "having the option to show the information", not
"showing the information" itself.
Viranch
___
Plasma-de
On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 6:00 PM, Marco Martin wrote:
> I'm for keeping the config option as "least possible damage", i think it
> has
> been discussed to death (including why user polls for features don't work)
>
this is only a developers' poll
Viranch
__
On Wednesday 12 September 2012, Viranch Mehta wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Apparently, there has been a rage among users[1] regarding whether to
> have remaining time be shown in battery monitor. Note that this bug has
> considerable amount of upvotes, so I'm not reopening this for the heck of
> it, I'm doing
Hello,
what about adding the option to hide or show this information?
Regards,
Djuro Drljaca
On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 2:14 PM, Viranch Mehta wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Apparently, there has been a rage among users[1] regarding whether to
> have remaining time be shown in battery monitor. Note that this bu
Hi,
Apparently, there has been a rage among users[1] regarding whether to
have remaining time be shown in battery monitor. Note that this bug has
considerable amount of upvotes, so I'm not reopening this for the heck of
it, I'm doing it because of the upvotes. Plus, we've never really had a poll
f
12 matches
Mail list logo