On 23/08/2010 21:41, Aaron J. Seigo wrote:
On Saturday, August 21, 2010, Dario Freddi wrote:
However, I'd really like to remove that code from kdelibs as it definitely
does not belong there. However, after a quick look at the code, I found out
that such a thing would mean having a hard
On Sunday 22 August 2010 11:50:41 Kevin Ottens wrote:
On Saturday 21 August 2010 23:59:52 Dario Freddi wrote:
You probably remember that back in the days (I'm talking about Tokamak in
Randa) I helped Rob getting remote widgets in shape for release. This
also implied putting a private branch
On Saturday, August 21, 2010, Dario Freddi wrote:
However, I'd really like to remove that code from kdelibs as it definitely
does not belong there. However, after a quick look at the code, I found out
that such a thing would mean having a hard dependency on QtJolie in
kdelibs.
right now, yes,
On Saturday 21 August 2010 23:59:52 Dario Freddi wrote:
You probably remember that back in the days (I'm talking about Tokamak in
Randa) I helped Rob getting remote widgets in shape for release. This also
implied putting a private branch of QtJolie straight into libplasma, due to
the fact that
Hi there,
I'm in the middle of moving right now (will be more stable after the
1st of September, at my new work place), but I'd be glad to discuss
anything related to QtJolie (given that I'm the maintainer of the
Jolie interpreter) if questions about Jolie and/or MetaService arise.
On Sat, Aug
