---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://svn.reviewboard.kde.org/r/6005/#review9126
---
The bug is in the Notes code. It you remove lines 412 - 417 from
On 2010-11-30 01:04:03, Davide Bettio wrote:
Should we apply this patch while waiting someone who fix this bug in Qt?
Aaron Seigo wrote:
sure (if only because the bug has been closed as out of scope), but
annotate the code with a comment explaining the situation and a link to the
On 2010-11-30 01:04:03, Davide Bettio wrote:
Should we apply this patch while waiting someone who fix this bug in Qt?
Aaron Seigo wrote:
sure (if only because the bug has been closed as out of scope), but
annotate the code with a comment explaining the situation and a link to the
On 2010-11-30 01:04:03, Davide Bettio wrote:
Should we apply this patch while waiting someone who fix this bug in Qt?
Aaron Seigo wrote:
sure (if only because the bug has been closed as out of scope), but
annotate the code with a comment explaining the situation and a link to the
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://svn.reviewboard.kde.org/r/6005/#review9041
---
More likely a Qt Bug. Seems similar to this one which I filed a
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://svn.reviewboard.kde.org/r/6005/#review9050
---
Should we apply this patch while waiting someone who fix this bug
On 2010-11-30 01:04:03, Davide Bettio wrote:
Should we apply this patch while waiting someone who fix this bug in Qt?
sure (if only because the bug has been closed as out of scope), but annotate
the code with a comment explaining the situation and a link to the bug report
on the qt bug
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://svn.reviewboard.kde.org/r/6005/
---
Review request for Plasma and Stephen Kelly.
Summary
---
Text format