On April 17, 2009 01:55:27 Aurélien Gâteau wrote:
> > On 2009-04-14 15:13:59, Aaron Seigo wrote:
>
> Shipped, do you think it should be backported?
have you tested this with popups *on* the screensaver? (eg. clock plasmoid on
screensaver has a calendar popup)
it probably won't cause trouble, but
> On 2009-04-14 15:13:59, Aaron Seigo wrote:
> >
>
> Aurélien Gâteau wrote:
> Shipped, do you think it should be backported?
imho yes, for example kubuntu has a local patch for this and other distris
probably too.
- Beat
---
This
> On 2009-04-14 15:13:59, Aaron Seigo wrote:
> >
Shipped, do you think it should be backported?
- Aurélien
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://reviewboard.kde.org/r/546/#review921
-
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://reviewboard.kde.org/r/546/#review921
---
Ship it!
- Aaron
On 2009-04-14 13:17:59, Aurélien Gâteau wrote:
>
>
> On 2009-04-14 08:58:10, Aaron Seigo wrote:
> > unfortunately, this breaks "passive" mode: if you click on a notification
> > and then click off it, it goes away. ok, minor annoyance, right? open the
> > clock ... the calendar pops up and then goes away as soon as you click back
> > onto the
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://reviewboard.kde.org/r/546/
---
(Updated 2009-04-14 13:17:59.288730)
Review request for Plasma.
Changes
---
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://reviewboard.kde.org/r/546/#review916
---
unfortunately, this breaks "passive" mode: if you click on a notificatio
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://reviewboard.kde.org/r/546/
---
(Updated 2009-04-14 07:48:09.451730)
Review request for Plasma.
Changes
---
On April 10, 2009 18:25:49 Aaron J. Seigo wrote:
> On Friday 10 April 2009, Chani wrote:
> > I'm still wondering... why does the existing screensaver restacking code
> > not work on these popups?
>
> hazarding a complete guess: because we mark the windows to be ignored by
> the window manager. and
On 4/11/09, Aaron J. Seigo wrote:
> On Friday 10 April 2009, Chani wrote:
> > I'm still wondering... why does the existing screensaver restacking code
> > not work on these popups?
>
>
> hazarding a complete guess: because we mark the windows to be ignored by the
> window manager. and apparentl
On Friday 10 April 2009, Chani wrote:
> I'm still wondering... why does the existing screensaver restacking code
> not work on these popups?
hazarding a complete guess: because we mark the windows to be ignored by the
window manager. and apparently that means no help, not even for the
screensave
On April 9, 2009 21:36:13 Lucas Murray wrote:
> ---
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> http://reviewboard.kde.org/r/546/#review890
> ---
>
>
> Although the ol
> On 2009-04-09 21:36:18, Lucas Murray wrote:
> > Although the old code also used the tool window type I would highly
> > recommend against using the same technique again as it's only by chance
> > that it does what it does and can be broken fairly innocently by both
> > developers working on
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://reviewboard.kde.org/r/546/#review890
---
Although the old code also used the tool window type I would highly reco
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://reviewboard.kde.org/r/546/
---
(Updated 2009-04-09 09:04:21.007123)
Review request for Plasma.
Summary
---
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://reviewboard.kde.org/r/546/
---
Review request for Plasma.
Summary
---
Use Qt::Tool window flag to prevent p
16 matches
Mail list logo
