---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/105008/#review14173
---
This review has been submitted with commit
2e417e38e3b9051eebc
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/105008/#review14117
---
So... what are we going to do with this review request?
- Davi
> On May 22, 2012, 12:52 p.m., Aaron J. Seigo wrote:
> > "nepomuk works differently" should not be a reason for this particular
> > change.
> >
> > the question is whether to store the icons in nepomuk or not. if they are
> > stored in nepomuk, then the information stays with the activities. i
> On May 22, 2012, 12:52 p.m., Aaron J. Seigo wrote:
> > "nepomuk works differently" should not be a reason for this particular
> > change.
> >
> > the question is whether to store the icons in nepomuk or not. if they are
> > stored in nepomuk, then the information stays with the activities. i
> On May 22, 2012, 12:52 p.m., Aaron J. Seigo wrote:
> > "nepomuk works differently" should not be a reason for this particular
> > change.
> >
> > the question is whether to store the icons in nepomuk or not. if they are
> > stored in nepomuk, then the information stays with the activities. i
> On May 22, 2012, 12:52 p.m., Aaron J. Seigo wrote:
> > "nepomuk works differently" should not be a reason for this particular
> > change.
> >
> > the question is whether to store the icons in nepomuk or not. if they are
> > stored in nepomuk, then the information stays with the activities. i
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/105008/#review14047
---
"nepomuk works differently" should not be a reason for this par
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/105008/
---
Review request for Plasma and Ivan Čukić.
Description
---
Since we ca
