> On Sept. 29, 2011, 11:55 a.m., Sebastian Kügler wrote:
> > First, this is the wrong way to fix it. Why should this confirmation only
> > go for a specific widget? This introduces inconsistence in the UI that
> > leads to more data loss (the next time a user deletes a widget, she'll
> > expec
> On Sept. 29, 2011, 11:55 a.m., Sebastian Kügler wrote:
> > First, this is the wrong way to fix it. Why should this confirmation only
> > go for a specific widget? This introduces inconsistence in the UI that
> > leads to more data loss (the next time a user deletes a widget, she'll
> > expec
> On Sept. 29, 2011, 11:55 a.m., Sebastian Kügler wrote:
> > First, this is the wrong way to fix it. Why should this confirmation only
> > go for a specific widget? This introduces inconsistence in the UI that
> > leads to more data loss (the next time a user deletes a widget, she'll
> > expec
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/102727/#review6906
---
First, this is the wrong way to fix it. Why should this confirma
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/102727/#review6904
---
Hey!
Even though I'm not anymore the maintainer of the quicklau
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/102727/
---
(Updated Sept. 28, 2011, 8:44 p.m.)
Review request for Plasma.
Descripti
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/102727/
---
(Updated Sept. 28, 2011, 8:44 p.m.)
Review request for Plasma.
Descripti
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/102727/
---
(Updated Sept. 28, 2011, 8:43 p.m.)
Review request for Plasma.
Descripti
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/102727/
---
Review request for Plasma.
Description
---
Hello,
This patch is addi
