---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/118347/#review58724
---
Unfortunately this way we cannot have a plural aware suffix.
On May 29, 2014, 2:30 p.m., David Edmundson wrote:
Unfortunately this way we cannot have a plural aware suffix.
Then why port away?
Linking against kde4libsupport seems like the lesser of two evils.
Well then we need to decide how we're going to get to the proper fix. We can't
just
On May 29, 2014, 2:30 p.m., David Edmundson wrote:
Unfortunately this way we cannot have a plural aware suffix.
Then why port away?
Linking against kde4libsupport seems like the lesser of two evils.
Aleix Pol Gonzalez wrote:
Well then we need to decide how we're going to get to
On May 29, 2014, 2:30 p.m., David Edmundson wrote:
Unfortunately this way we cannot have a plural aware suffix.
Then why port away?
Linking against kde4libsupport seems like the lesser of two evils.
Aleix Pol Gonzalez wrote:
Well then we need to decide how we're going to get to
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/118347/
---
Review request for Plasma.
Repository: plasma-workspace
Description
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/118347/#review58567
---
Unfortunately this way we cannot have a plural aware suffix.
On May 27, 2014, 3:52 p.m., Martin Klapetek wrote:
Unfortunately this way we cannot have a plural aware suffix.
What if you do this from code like setSuffix(i18np(signular, plural,
value)); ?
Oh but that's not a binding so it won't auto update...too much time in QML xD
Nevermind.
On May 27, 2014, 3:52 p.m., Martin Klapetek wrote:
Unfortunately this way we cannot have a plural aware suffix.
What if you do this from code like setSuffix(i18np(signular, plural,
value)); ?
Martin Klapetek wrote:
Oh but that's not a binding so it won't auto update...too
