> On Jan. 27, 2016, 4:55 p.m., Thomas Pfeiffer wrote:
> > So, the situation is not that special: We ask for confirmation to err on
> > the side of caution (which makes sense since there is no going back) but
> > don't want to bother users with dialogs they don't care about. In fact, the
> > si
> On Jan. 27, 2016, 3:55 nachm., Thomas Pfeiffer wrote:
> > So, the situation is not that special: We ask for confirmation to err on
> > the side of caution (which makes sense since there is no going back) but
> > don't want to bother users with dialogs they don't care about. In fact, the
> >
> On Jan. 27, 2016, 4:55 p.m., Thomas Pfeiffer wrote:
> > So, the situation is not that special: We ask for confirmation to err on
> > the side of caution (which makes sense since there is no going back) but
> > don't want to bother users with dialogs they don't care about. In fact, the
> > si
> On Jan. 27, 2016, 3:55 p.m., Thomas Pfeiffer wrote:
> > So, the situation is not that special: We ask for confirmation to err on
> > the side of caution (which makes sense since there is no going back) but
> > don't want to bother users with dialogs they don't care about. In fact, the
> > si
> On Jan. 27, 2016, 4:55 p.m., Thomas Pfeiffer wrote:
> > So, the situation is not that special: We ask for confirmation to err on
> > the side of caution (which makes sense since there is no going back) but
> > don't want to bother users with dialogs they don't care about. In fact, the
> > si
> On Jan. 27, 2016, 3:55 p.m., Thomas Pfeiffer wrote:
> > So, the situation is not that special: We ask for confirmation to err on
> > the side of caution (which makes sense since there is no going back) but
> > don't want to bother users with dialogs they don't care about. In fact, the
> > si
> On Jan. 27, 2016, 4:55 p.m., Thomas Pfeiffer wrote:
> > So, the situation is not that special: We ask for confirmation to err on
> > the side of caution (which makes sense since there is no going back) but
> > don't want to bother users with dialogs they don't care about. In fact, the
> > si
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/126907/#review91669
---
So, the situation is not that special: We ask for confirmatio
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/126907/
---
Review request for Plasma and Thomas Pfeiffer.
Bugs: 336053
https://b
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/126907/#review91665
---
Another option could be to just remove the Message box. For t
10 matches
Mail list logo