On Tuesday 05 May 2009 18:57:49 Dario Freddi wrote:
There is not a DBus interface exportable, however for 4.4 it would be nice
if we could remove that code from PowerDevil and put it somewhere else
(ideas, anyone?)
Rob, feel free to contact me for more clarification on this. I really think
On Saturday 02 May 2009 15:48:55 Rob Scheepmaker wrote:
That makes me thinking: is there a easy
and well working way to determine if the computer is actually being used at
the moment (I mean some central kde facility, not having to rely on mouse
polling or stuff like that). Because in that
There is not a DBus interface exportable, however for 4.4 it would be nice if
we could remove that code from PowerDevil and put it somewhere else (ideas,
anyone?)
Rob, feel free to contact me for more clarification on this. I really think
you should use XSync over XScreensaver.
On Tuesday 05
On Friday 01 May 2009, Rob Scheepmaker wrote:
Hello all,
I would like in discuss what things should still be improved to the way
jobs are handled in the systemtray before the freeze. These are some of the
things I noticed or are often requested:
* Auto hiding after the dialog with jobs and
On Friday 01 May 2009 20:37:48 Chani wrote:
hrrm. you say some prefer no-autohide, then suggest a way to configure the
autohide *time*. can we just offer an autohide checkbox and hardcode the
time to something reasonable? (6 seconds seems ok so far)
Probably better yes.
* I don't like
On Friday 01 May 2009 20:39:43 Marco Martin wrote:
On Friday 01 May 2009, Rob Scheepmaker wrote:
* Auto hiding after the dialog with jobs and notifications get's
automatically shown because one get's added. Currently this is hardcoded
to 6 seconds, but there are quite some requests for
On Friday 01 May 2009 21:53:04 Aaron J. Seigo wrote:
On Friday 01 May 2009, Rob Scheepmaker wrote:
* Auto hiding after the dialog with jobs and notifications get's
automatically shown because one get's added. Currently this is hardcoded
to 6 seconds, but there are quite some requests for
On Friday 01 May 2009, Aaron J. Seigo wrote:
On Friday 01 May 2009, Rob Scheepmaker wrote:
* Auto hiding after the dialog with jobs and notifications get's
automatically shown because one get's added. Currently this is hardcoded
to 6 seconds, but there are quite some requests for having no
On Friday 01 May 2009 18:40:00 Rob Scheepmaker wrote:
These are the main issues I encountered. Please try the systray from trunk
some time and give your feedback on these issues or provide your own
points.
I've been seeing a logic issue for some time, I'll use this poke to finally
tell you
On Saturday 02 May 2009 17:48:13 Sebastian Kügler wrote:
On Friday 01 May 2009 18:40:00 Rob Scheepmaker wrote:
These are the main issues I encountered. Please try the systray from
trunk some time and give your feedback on these issues or provide your
own points.
I've been seeing a logic
we're supposed to have some kind of logging facility, right? ideally I'd
expect that notifications that stopped doing anything more than 5 minutes
ago would get sent away somewhere so that I'd have to explicitly click
some sort of history button or something to show them. I might not want
On Saturday 02 May 2009 18:17:56 Rob Scheepmaker wrote:
On Saturday 02 May 2009 17:48:13 Sebastian Kügler wrote:
On Friday 01 May 2009 18:40:00 Rob Scheepmaker wrote:
These are the main issues I encountered. Please try the systray from
trunk some time and give your feedback on these
Hello all,
I would like in discuss what things should still be improved to the way jobs
are handled in the systemtray before the freeze. These are some of the things
I noticed or are often requested:
* Auto hiding after the dialog with jobs and notifications get's automatically
shown because
On Friday 01 May 2009, Rob Scheepmaker wrote:
Hello all,
I would like in discuss what things should still be improved to the way
jobs are handled in the systemtray before the freeze. These are some of the
things I noticed or are often requested:
* Auto hiding after the dialog with jobs and
On May 1, 2009 09:40:00 Rob Scheepmaker wrote:
Hello all,
I would like in discuss what things should still be improved to the way
jobs are handled in the systemtray before the freeze. These are some of the
things I noticed or are often requested:
* Auto hiding after the dialog with jobs and
On Friday 01 May 2009, Rob Scheepmaker wrote:
* Auto hiding after the dialog with jobs and notifications get's
automatically shown because one get's added. Currently this is hardcoded to
6 seconds, but there are quite some requests for having no auto hiding at
all. I do very much prefer
On Friday 10 April 2009 19:38:24 Aaron J. Seigo wrote:
On Friday 10 April 2009, Rob Scheepmaker wrote:
Still that doesn't make it any easier to interpret say '3/4' in front of
a
ah and if all are completed, then you can just say N instead of N/N ...
so to be ++ verbose, this would give us
On Tuesday 07 April 2009 03:04:32 Aaron J. Seigo wrote:
On Monday 06 April 2009, Celeste Lyn Paul wrote:
On Monday 06 April 2009 08:01:16 pm Aaron J. Seigo wrote:
On Monday 06 April 2009, Rob Scheepmaker wrote:
On Monday 06 April 2009 19:02:58 Aaron J. Seigo wrote:
what about the
On Friday 10 April 2009 17:50:54 Marco Martin wrote:
On Friday 10 April 2009, Rob Scheepmaker wrote:
I've been doing some more thinking about this: what about splitting this
up in 2 icons? One i icon with a number that shows the total amount of
notifications, and the spinner with a number
On Friday 10 April 2009 18:58:53 Aaron J. Seigo wrote:
On Friday 10 April 2009, Rob Scheepmaker wrote:
Well, the problem kind of is that the systray shows multiple things:
running jobs and notifications, which are distinctively different. Still
are they?
both are communicating system or
On Friday 10 April 2009, Rob Scheepmaker wrote:
Still that doesn't make it any easier to interpret say '3/4' in front of a
spinner.
to me it says there are four things here, three of which are completed
notifications can therefore be viewed as jobs that completed in zero time.
--
Aaron J.
Am Montag, 6. April 2009 16:30:21 schrieb Rob Scheepmaker:
Hello,
I wanted to discuss what I think should be improved in the plasma
systemtray... not the spec, but the jobs/notifications. We discussed some
of this already at tokamak, but there's still a lot to be done if we want
this to be
Even if the icon gets some animation, it is still small and the event
notification closed is still the same, i.e. the signal remains the same as
the user might just notice the it's gone and not whereto. There have been
people stating that they thought the job was done because the notification
On Thursday 09 April 2009 16:47:41 Sven Burmeister wrote:
Am Montag, 6. April 2009 16:30:21 schrieb Rob Scheepmaker:
Hello,
I wanted to discuss what I think should be improved in the plasma
systemtray... not the spec, but the jobs/notifications. We discussed some
of this already at
On Thursday 09 April 2009 17:48:20 dantti85-...@yahoo.com.br wrote:
Even if the icon gets some animation, it is still small and the event
notification closed is still the same, i.e. the signal remains the same
as the user might just notice the it's gone and not whereto. There have
been
On April 9, 2009 09:08:38 Rob Scheepmaker wrote:
On Thursday 09 April 2009 17:48:20 dantti85-...@yahoo.com.br wrote:
Even if the icon gets some animation, it is still small and the event
notification closed is still the same, i.e. the signal remains the
same as the user might just notice
On Thursday 09 April 2009 19:55:49 Chani wrote:
how do you warn the user if they close their laptop lid? :)
it does make sense for all other triggers, though.
...hmm, if the warning had a sound effect I might notice when closing my
laptop. *most* of the time I also wait for it to finish
On Tuesday 07 April 2009 14:23:49 Rob Scheepmaker wrote:
Yeah, it contains notifications (both 'normal' and file completed), and
jobs, so indeed it may not be entirely optimal. However, both the in
progress jobs and the completed jobs belong to an ExtenderGroup. The thing
that might help is if
On Tuesday 07 April 2009 03:20:40 Celeste Lyn Paul wrote:
On Monday 06 April 2009 09:04:32 pm Aaron J. Seigo wrote:
On Monday 06 April 2009, Celeste Lyn Paul wrote:
bonus is that we already have the spinner and we've been using it around
kde (plasma, gwenview, dolphin .. i keep seeing it in
Hello,
I wanted to discuss what I think should be improved in the plasma
systemtray... not the spec, but the jobs/notifications. We discussed some of
this already at tokamak, but there's still a lot to be done if we want this to
be implemented for 4.3:
* job widget layout. I don't know about
On Monday 06 April 2009, Rob Scheepmaker wrote:
* job widget layout. I don't know about the rest of you, but I think this
could be improved. The widget takes up quite some space vertically. I'm not
sure how we can keep the widget compact while still showing all the
information (we'll need to
On Monday 06 April 2009 19:02:58 Aaron J. Seigo wrote:
On Monday 06 April 2009, Rob Scheepmaker wrote:
* job widget layout. I don't know about the rest of you, but I think this
could be improved. The widget takes up quite some space vertically. I'm
not sure how we can keep the widget
On Monday 06 April 2009, Rob Scheepmaker wrote:
On Monday 06 April 2009 19:02:58 Aaron J. Seigo wrote:
On Monday 06 April 2009, Rob Scheepmaker wrote:
* job widget layout. I don't know about the rest of you, but I think
this could be improved. The widget takes up quite some space
On Monday 06 April 2009 08:01:16 pm Aaron J. Seigo wrote:
On Monday 06 April 2009, Rob Scheepmaker wrote:
On Monday 06 April 2009 19:02:58 Aaron J. Seigo wrote:
what about the busy widget we have? we could just use that, with a
number in the middle of it showing how many jobs are
On Monday 06 April 2009, Celeste Lyn Paul wrote:
On Monday 06 April 2009 08:01:16 pm Aaron J. Seigo wrote:
On Monday 06 April 2009, Rob Scheepmaker wrote:
On Monday 06 April 2009 19:02:58 Aaron J. Seigo wrote:
what about the busy widget we have? we could just use that, with a
number
On Monday 06 April 2009 09:04:32 pm Aaron J. Seigo wrote:
On Monday 06 April 2009, Celeste Lyn Paul wrote:
I think the idea of using animation to indicate a current job running is
a good idea. Is there an icon designed for this yet? At first I thought
of an animated Down arrow (a metaphor
Hello everybody,
Currently the plasma systray displays notifications and jobs. Both features can
be enabled or disabled separately through the plasma-desktop-appletrc. In 4.2
both default to true. While the notifications work very well and have no real
regressions compared to the passive popup
On Thursday 05 March 2009 17:07:20 Casper Clemence wrote:
Slightly off the point and has probably already been discussed but
replacing the (i) icon with an animated icon (eg, spinning gear)
would probably be sufficient to alert the user that something is _in
progress_. Of course that assumes
On Thursday 05 March 2009, Rob Scheepmaker wrote:
I think we should, for 4.2.2 either default the display of jobs to off, or
find a way to fix the problems and regressions.
when you try new things, it may not come out perfect on the first go-around.
that's to be expected.
but you can't really
, since it's then easy enough for the user to disable, if there
is certain functionality they miss or if they don't 'get' the way the systray
jobs work (the i).
The way the jobs might confuse some users less, is if we don't autohide the
popup while jobs are still in progress. That's a quite trivial
then easy enough for the user to disable,
if there is certain functionality they miss or if they don't 'get' the way
the systray jobs work (the i).
we can ask on the i18n list if we can backport those two strings.
The way the jobs might confuse some users less, is if we don't autohide the
popup
On Thu, Mar 5, 2009 at 12:32 PM, Rob Scheepmaker
r.scheepma...@student.utwente.nl wrote:
Hello everybody,
Currently the plasma systray displays notifications and jobs. Both features
can
be enabled or disabled separately through the plasma-desktop-appletrc. In 4.2
both default to true. While
42 matches
Mail list logo
