On Thursday 15 October 2009 21:40:34 Ivan Čukić wrote:
I'd still like to see a minimal implementation of this to already get
used to having this kind of stuff. So please, don't postpone. Plasma is
not the only potential user of this ...
Heh, Sebas, you haven't read the rest of the mails
On Tuesday 13 October 2009 10:16:32 Ivan Čukić wrote:
I've seen the thread about the activities overview.
Since there are bound to be some changes in the concepts behind activities,
virtual desktops etc. I'll postpone the plasma+nepomuk integration in order
to introduce it alongside the new
I'd still like to see a minimal implementation of this to already get used
to having this kind of stuff. So please, don't postpone. Plasma is not the
only potential user of this ...
Heh, Sebas, you haven't read the rest of the mails :)
I was talking about the plasma-ui integration (the
On Tuesday 13 October 2009, Ivan Čukić wrote:
Hi all,
I've seen the thread about the activities overview.
Since there are bound to be some changes in the concepts behind activities,
virtual desktops etc. I'll postpone the plasma+nepomuk integration in order
to introduce it alongside the
On October 13, 2009 10:17:26 Aaron J. Seigo wrote:
On October 13, 2009, Ivan Čukić wrote:
Since there are bound to be some changes in the concepts behind
activities, virtual desktops etc. I'll postpone the plasma+nepomuk
integration in order to introduce it alongside the new overview (I
On Tuesday 13 October 2009 19:17:26 Aaron J. Seigo wrote:
On October 13, 2009, Ivan Čukić wrote:
Since there are bound to be some changes in the concepts behind
activities, virtual desktops etc. I'll postpone the plasma+nepomuk
integration in order to introduce it alongside the new overview
On October 13, 2009, Ivan Čukić wrote:
On Tuesday 13 October 2009 19:17:26 Aaron J. Seigo wrote:
On October 13, 2009, Ivan Čukić wrote:
Since there are bound to be some changes in the concepts behind
activities, virtual desktops etc. I'll postpone the plasma+nepomuk
integration in
