On Friday, June 29, 2012, Thadeu Cascardo wrote:
> - Original message -
> > From: Rafael J. Wysocki
> >
> > Make the classmate-laptop driver define its PM callbacks through
> > a struct dev_pm_ops object rather than by using legacy PM hooks
> > in struct acpi_device_ops.
> >
> > Signed-o
samsung-laptop driver can be compiled if ACPI_VIDEO is either compiled or
exluded. Trying to built-in the samsung-laptop driver when ACPI_VIDEO is
compiled as module results in linking error.
This patch resolves this problem by setting proper dependencies in Kconfig.
Signed-off-by: Tomasz Moń
--
On Fri, Jun 29, 2012 at 02:24:38PM +0200, Corentin Chary wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 28, 2012 at 9:36 PM, Matthew Garrett wrote:
> > On Thu, Jun 28, 2012 at 02:30:17PM -0500, Seth Forshee wrote:
> >
> >> I actually don't think Corentin's solution is a bad one. It does suffer
> >> from a couple of shortco
Classmate V4 laptop includes a new accelerometer that can't be handled by
previous driver. This patch adds a new driver to handle it.
Signed-off-by: Miguel Gómez
---
drivers/platform/x86/classmate-laptop.c | 400 ++-
1 file changed, 398 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
Sorry, I made a mistake with the version. The patch is for Classmate V4
and not for V3, so I adjusted it accordingly.
Classmate V4 has a different acc
Classmate V3 laptop includes a new accelerometer that can't be handled by
previous driver. This patch adds a new driver to handle it.
Signed-off-by: Miguel Gómez
---
drivers/platform/x86/classmate-laptop.c | 400 ++-
1 file changed, 398 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
Classmate V3 has a different accelerometer than the previous versions. Main
differences between the new (ACCE0001) and the old one (ACCE) are:
* ACPI method calls need to receive 4 parameters instead of 2
* Values returned by the accelerometer are 2 bytes signed integers, instead
of one unsig
On Thu, Jun 28, 2012 at 9:36 PM, Matthew Garrett wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 28, 2012 at 02:30:17PM -0500, Seth Forshee wrote:
>
>> I actually don't think Corentin's solution is a bad one. It does suffer
>> from a couple of shortcomings though. First, it only works for broken
>> ACPI backlights, and some
On Wed, Jun 20, 2012 at 5:47 AM, Alex Hung wrote:
> According to responses from the BIOS team, ASUS_WMI_METHODID_DSTS2
> (0x53545344) will be used as future DSTS ID. In addition, calling
> asus_wmi_evaluate_method(ASUS_WMI_METHODID_DSTS2, 0, 0, NULL) returns
> ASUS_WMI_UNSUPPORTED_METHOD in new AS
On Wed, Jun 27, 2012 at 12:19 AM, Mattia Dongili wrote:
> Hi Corentin,
>
> On Wed, Jun 13, 2012 at 09:32:01AM +0200, Corentin Chary wrote:
> ...
>> +/* Promote the vendor interface instead of the generic video module.
>> + * This function allow DMI blacklists to be implemented by externals
>> + *
On Tue, Jun 26, 2012 at 8:42 PM, Matthew Garrett wrote:
> I think I'm fine with this. Whose tree should it go through?
Yours would probably be easier,
Thanks
--
Corentin Chary
http://xf.iksaif.net
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe platform-driver-x86"
in
the body of
- Original message -
> From: Rafael J. Wysocki
>
> Make the classmate-laptop driver define its PM callbacks through
> a struct dev_pm_ops object rather than by using legacy PM hooks
> in struct acpi_device_ops.
>
> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki
> ---
>
> Hi all,
>
> I overlooked th
於 五，2012-06-29 於 03:57 +0100，Matthew Garrett 提到：
> On Fri, Jun 29, 2012 at 10:43:59AM +0800, joeyli wrote:
>
> > http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/hardware/gg487382.aspx
> >
> > In WDDM architecture, in spec p.5, there have a "Monitor" driver to
> > check the WDDM driver support brightne
13 matches
Mail list logo
