On 10/10/2013 08:59 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Thursday, October 10, 2013 09:02:55 AM Aaron Lu wrote:
>> On 10/10/2013 08:29 AM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
>>> On Tuesday, October 08, 2013 02:40:00 PM Aaron Lu wrote:
According to Matthew Garrett, "Windows 8 leaves backlight control up
>>>
> On Wed, Oct 09, 2013 at 11:00:06PM -0700, David Cohen wrote:
>> From: Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan
>>
>>
>> +# I2C Devices
>> +obj-$(subst m,y,$(CONFIG_SENSORS_EMC1403)) += platform_emc1403.o
>> +obj-$(subst m,y,$(CONFIG_SENSORS_LIS3LV02D)) += platform_lis331.o
>
> I am a bit confused by the platf
On Thu, 2013-10-10 at 16:59 +0100, Corentin Chary wrote:
>
> This doesn't really seems to be related to wmi, and is likely to be
> available only on a subset of models. Maybe it should a separate
> driver instead ?
This version seems to be implemented entirely in WMI, and it's using the
same WMI
On Thursday, October 10, 2013 09:02:55 AM Aaron Lu wrote:
> On 10/10/2013 08:29 AM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > On Tuesday, October 08, 2013 02:40:00 PM Aaron Lu wrote:
> >> According to Matthew Garrett, "Windows 8 leaves backlight control up
> >> to individual graphics drivers rather than making
On Wed, Oct 09, 2013 at 11:00:06PM -0700, David Cohen wrote:
> From: Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan
>
> +# I2C Devices
> +obj-$(subst m,y,$(CONFIG_SENSORS_EMC1403)) += platform_emc1403.o
> +obj-$(subst m,y,$(CONFIG_SENSORS_LIS3LV02D)) += platform_lis331.o
I am a bit confused by the platform data for