Hi Darren!
On Wed, Oct 21, 2015 at 4:44 PM, Darren Hart <dvh...@infradead.org> wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 21, 2015 at 12:33:52PM -0200, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
>> On Wed, Oct 21, 2015, at 08:46, David Herrmann wrote:
>> > The thinkpad_acpi driver currently emits error
are supported by the i915 driver just fine.
Downgrade the error message to a normal pr_info() and stop telling people
to report it to IBM.
Signed-off-by: David Herrmann <dh.herrm...@gmail.com>
---
drivers/platform/x86/thinkpad_acpi.c | 3 +--
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
Hi
On Fri, Jun 13, 2014 at 5:04 AM, Nick xerofo...@gmail.com wrote:
diff --git a/drivers/platform/x86/toshiba_acpi.c
b/drivers/platform/x86/toshiba_acpi.c
index 76441dc..dfd2243 100644
--- a/drivers/platform/x86/toshiba_acpi.c
+++ b/drivers/platform/x86/toshiba_acpi.c
@@ -1238,7 +1238,7 @@
Hi Len
On Sun, Feb 19, 2012 at 8:56 PM, Corentin Chary
corentin.ch...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Jan 30, 2012 at 9:26 AM, Corentin Chary
corentin.ch...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Jan 17, 2012 at 8:08 AM, Corentin Chary corenti...@iksaif.net
wrote:
On these laptops, the ACPI video is not
on my N210 with linux-3.2. Feel free to add a:
Tested-by: David Herrmann dh.herrm...@googlemail.com
I will talk to the intel drm developers about the intel_backlight
issues as they don't seem related to this driver.
Thanks
David
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe platform
On Thu, Nov 24, 2011 at 8:07 AM, Corentin Chary
corentin.ch...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi David,I refreshed the patches on the github repo, could you re-try
them ?Thanks
Works great. The error message doesn't appear anymore. The devices
still work as expected.
Tested-by: David Herrmann dh.herrm
couldn't find the samsung backlight and so
I tried the intel back light again and now it works.
So:
Tested-by: David Herrmann dh.herrm...@googlemail.com
My model is Samsung N210 btw.
Regards
David
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe platform-driver-x86
in
the body
.
I've commented on a few patches about some small stuff. But it didn't
break any existing stuff / introduce regressions.
Feel free to carry this on the patches:
Tested-by: David Herrmann dh.herrm...@googlemail.com
I haven't had the time to review the code more deeply, though. I might
do that later
On Wed, Nov 23, 2011 at 5:54 PM, Corentin Chary
corentin.ch...@gmail.com wrote:
My BIOS provides this option, too. However, this driver does not
detect it on my machine. During initialization I get:
samsung_laptop: SABI command 0x0078 failed with completion flag 0xaa
Maybe you can help
On Wed, Nov 23, 2011 at 7:11 PM, Corentin Chary
corentin.ch...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Nov 23, 2011 at 6:10 PM, David Herrmann
dh.herrm...@googlemail.com wrote:
On Wed, Nov 23, 2011 at 5:54 PM, Corentin Chary
corentin.ch...@gmail.com wrote:
My BIOS provides this option, too. However
Hi Greg
On Fri, Sep 2, 2011 at 12:50 AM, gre...@suse.de wrote:
samsung_init() should not return success if not all devices are initialized.
Otherwise, samsung_exit() will dereference sdev NULL pointers and others.
Signed-off-by: David Herrmann dh.herrm...@googlemail.com
Cc: stable sta
of */
sdev = platform_device_register_simple(samsung, -1, NULL, 0);
if (IS_ERR(sdev))
Thank you, Jason.
Tested-by: David Herrmann dh.herrm...@googlemail.com
And Greg, could you actually git add the new samsung patches in your
repository? You added them to series but didn't submit
samsung_init() should not return success if not all devices are initialized.
Otherwise, samsung_exit() will dereference sdev NULL pointers and others.
Signed-off-by: David Herrmann dh.herrm...@googlemail.com
---
drivers/platform/x86/samsung-laptop.c |3 +--
1 files changed, 1 insertions
/to brightness level
0.
This patch adds detection and a non-intrusive workaround for the above issues.
Signed-off-by: David Herrmann dh.herrm...@googlemail.com
---
Hi
This patch is originally from Jason Stubbs. See here:
http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/gregkh/patches.git;a=blob;f=platform
14 matches
Mail list logo
