Any specifics on why it would be unlikely to become official? Like lack of
testing and such? I don't seem find any official 64 bit kernel RPM release.
The first I find is that I need a biarch gcc before I can easily build a
64 bit kernel, and I do have a patch lying around that will produce a biarc
On Wed, May 18, 2005 at 04:16:24PM +, Dariusz Rojewski wrote:
> On Wed, May 18, 2005 at 12:34:09AM +0300, Elan Ruusamäe wrote:
> > no /sbin/{mkfs,fsck}.cram(fs) ?
> >
> Nope. There are in util-linux package
Uhm. typo. They are in [...] :->
--
Dariusz Rojewski
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
__
how this should be handled?
-- Forwarded Message --
Subject: ERRORS: rlocate.spec
Date: Saturday 21 May 2005 18:26
From: PLD ac-i686 builder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
rlocate.spec (HEAD): FAILED
--- rlocate.spec:HEAD:
Build-Time: user:16.2
On Saturday 21 of May 2005 16:12, Elan Ruusamäe wrote:
> what's wrong here?
it's me.. fiexed.
___
pld-devel-en mailing list
pld-devel-en@lists.pld-linux.org
http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/pld-devel-en
what's wrong here?
-- Forwarded Message --
Subject: ERRORS: rlocate.spec
Date: Saturday 21 May 2005 17:08
From: PLD ac-src builder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
rlocate.spec (HEAD): FAILED
--- rlocate.spec:HEAD:
Build-Time: user:0.91s sys:0.43
