On Sun, 22 May 2005 09:36:16 +0200, Jakub Bogusz wrote:
>
> Or you can use crosssparc64-{binutils,gcc}.
> (just rpmbuild kernel*.spec --target sparc64-pld-linux)
>
I already have a biarch gcc before crosssparc64 was even built.
> I have some unofficial (but working at least on Ultra1) builds of
Fryderyk Dziarmagowski wrote:
>
> On Mon, 23 May 2005 07:37:05 +0200 (CEST)
> Andrzej Krzysztofowicz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > > > After upgrading to libgnomecanvas 2.10.1 evolution fails to switch
> > > > components (i.e. from calendar to addressbook, etc). Downgrading
> > > > to 2.10.0-3
On Mon, 23 May 2005 07:37:05 +0200 (CEST)
Andrzej Krzysztofowicz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > After upgrading to libgnomecanvas 2.10.1 evolution fails to switch
> > > components (i.e. from calendar to addressbook, etc). Downgrading
> > > to 2.10.0-3 helps.
> > >
> > > ppc, gcc 4.0, glibc 2.3.
Fryderyk Dziarmagowski wrote:
> On Mon, 23 May 2005 01:17:36 +0100
> wrobell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > After upgrading to libgnomecanvas 2.10.1 evolution fails to switch
> > components (i.e. from calendar to addressbook, etc). Downgrading to
> > 2.10.0-3 helps.
> >
> > ppc, gcc 4.0, glibc
On Mon, 23 May 2005 01:17:36 +0100
wrobell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> After upgrading to libgnomecanvas 2.10.1 evolution fails to switch
> components (i.e. from calendar to addressbook, etc). Downgrading to
> 2.10.0-3 helps.
>
> ppc, gcc 4.0, glibc 2.3.5 (built with gcc 3.4)
http://bugzilla.g
After upgrading to libgnomecanvas 2.10.1 evolution fails to switch
components (i.e. from calendar to addressbook, etc). Downgrading to
2.10.0-3 helps.
ppc, gcc 4.0, glibc 2.3.5 (built with gcc 3.4)
wrobell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
___
pld-devel-en maili
On Sat, May 21, 2005 at 06:38:59PM -0700, Chris Poon wrote:
> Any specifics on why it would be unlikely to become official? Like lack of
> testing and such? I don't seem find any official 64 bit kernel RPM release.
> The first I find is that I need a biarch gcc before I can easily build a
> 64 bit
