On Wed, 2005-06-22 at 20:27 +0200, Tomasz Wittner wrote:
> Sorry - I've just checked wget-1.9.10 and wget-1.10 without this patch -
> user_agent = blabla in ~/.wgetrc works. I don't know why - what is the
> meaning of 2nd field of struct commands[] = (from src/init.c)?
It's passed to the setter
On Wed 22. of June 2005 19:30, Tomasz Wittner wrote:
> On Wed 22. of June 2005 18:16, Paweł Sakowski wrote:
> > On Wed, 2005-06-22 at 18:06 +0300, Elan Ruusamäe wrote:
>
> [...]
>
> > > > -Patch12: %{name}-user_agent_conf.patch
> > >
> > > this is also in 1.10?
> >
> > Actually, I'm pretty co
Dnia 22-06-2005, śro o godzinie 19:42 +0200, Jakub Bogusz napisał(a):
> On Tue, Jun 21, 2005 at 02:23:05PM +0200, Flyspray - The bug killer! wrote:
> > Project: PLD 2.x (Ac)
> >
> > Reported by: Patryk Zawadzki (patrys)
> > Package: fastjar
> > Version: 0.93
> > Summary: Confli
On Tue, Jun 21, 2005 at 02:23:05PM +0200, Flyspray - The bug killer! wrote:
> Project: PLD 2.x (Ac)
>
> Reported by: Patryk Zawadzki (patrys)
> Package: fastjar
> Version: 0.93
> Summary: Conflicting P/O with gcc-java-tools
>
> Fastjar provides the fastjar binary (required
On Wed 22. of June 2005 18:16, Paweł Sakowski wrote:
> On Wed, 2005-06-22 at 18:06 +0300, Elan Ruusamäe wrote:
[...]
> > > -Patch12: %{name}-user_agent_conf.patch
> >
> > this is also in 1.10?
>
> Actually, I'm pretty confident this patch was a no-op. It would
> basically just rename one variable :
On Wed, 2005-06-22 at 19:21 +0300, Elan Ruusamäe wrote:
> > The LFS patch is no more. Now there's native large file support in wget.
> but the porn patch still doesn't apply?
Nope.
> (it's not applied by default), so the
> TODO should stay (or rewritten as -porn patch doesn't apply)
OK. But I'
On Wednesday 22 June 2005 19:16, Paweł Sakowski wrote:
> On Wed, 2005-06-22 at 18:06 +0300, Elan Ruusamäe wrote:
> > > # $Revision$, $Date$
> > > -# TODO
> > > -# - -porn patch does not work with LFS
> >
> > did you fix it that you removed todo? it doesn't look so!
>
> The LFS patch is no more. No
On Wed, 2005-06-22 at 18:06 +0300, Elan Ruusamäe wrote:
> > # $Revision$, $Date$
> > -# TODO
> > -# - -porn patch does not work with LFS
> did you fix it that you removed todo? it doesn't look so!
The LFS patch is no more. Now there's native large file support in wget.
> > -Patch11: %{name}-1.
On Wednesday 22 June 2005 12:47, saq wrote:
> Author: saq Date: Wed Jun 22 09:47:51 2005 GMT
> Module: SPECS Tag: HEAD
> Log message:
> - starting upgrade to 1.10
>
> Files affected:
> SPECS:
>wget.spec (1.114 -> 1.115)
>
> Diffs:
