On Wed, 07 Sep 2005, wrobell wrote:
> On Wed, 2005-09-07 at 11:03 +0200, Jan Rekorajski wrote:
> > Example: http://svn.pld-linux.org/svn/rc-scripts
> > I want to keep only trunk, branches and _some_ tags, tell me how to do
> > it, and how to prevent svn up from getting all tags.
>
> svn up trunk?
On Wed, 07 Sep 2005, Paweł Sakowski wrote:
> On Wed, 2005-09-07 at 10:20 +0100, wrobell wrote:
> > - atomic commit (so we can commit patches and specs with one move
> > and revert it easily later if there is a need)
>
> A propos reverting.
>
> One thing that we use (need?) and svn lacks is sup
ehm, perl contains no files except %doc
don't you mean perl-modules?
and, instead of manually filling runtime deps, include macros.perl and let rpm
fill the deps?
On Wednesday 07 September 2005 22:47, aredridel wrote:
> Author: aredridelDate: Wed Sep 7 19:47:17 2005 GMT
> Mo
On Wed, Sep 07, 2005 at 06:01:30PM +0200, Paweł Sakowski wrote:
> The question is: is there anyone who uses/needs `rpm -q --changelog`
> and/or wants/needs to have the changelog available offline? I would be
> happy with `svn log` to see the changelog.
Not that I use `rpm -q changelog`, but I find
On Wed, 2005-09-07 at 10:20 +0100, wrobell wrote:
> - atomic commit (so we can commit patches and specs with one move
> and revert it easily later if there is a need)
A propos reverting.
One thing that we use (need?) and svn lacks is support for $Log$. So, we
would be missing autogenerated %cha
On Wed, 2005-09-07 at 16:51 +0200, Tomasz Pala wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 07, 2005 at 10:20:54AM +0100, wrobell wrote:
> >
> > svn gives us some advantages. disadvantages? any real, which makes life
> > really painful?
>
> How to resolve conflict? I've got a situation:
>
> ~: vi blabla
> ~: svn ci bla
On Wed, 2005-09-07 at 16:51 +0200, Tomasz Pala wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 07, 2005 at 10:20:54AM +0100, wrobell wrote:
> >
> > svn gives us some advantages. disadvantages? any real, which makes life
> > really painful?
>
> How to resolve conflict? I've got a situation:
>
> ~: vi blabla
> ~: svn ci bla
On Wed, Sep 07, 2005 at 10:20:54AM +0100, wrobell wrote:
>
> svn gives us some advantages. disadvantages? any real, which makes life
> really painful?
How to resolve conflict? I've got a situation:
~: vi blabla
~: svn ci blabla
snv reports conflict here
[fixing it manually]
~: svn ci blabla
svn
On Wed, 7 Sep 2005, Elan [iso-8859-1] Ruusamäe wrote:
> anybody against splitting pam to pam and pam-libs?
>
> # rpm -Uhv pam-0.80.1-1.amd64.rpm
> Preparing...### [100%]
> file /etc/security/consoles from install of pam-0.80.1-1 confli
hi
anybody against splitting pam to pam and pam-libs?
# rpm -Uhv pam-0.80.1-1.amd64.rpm
Preparing...### [100%]
file /etc/security/consoles from install of pam-0.80.1-1 conflicts with
file from package pam-0.79.1-4
file /etc/
On Wednesday 07 September 2005 01:58, Krystian T wrote:
> Hi
> I have built mythtv.spec --without nvidia and it's failed
> (X11-driver-nvidia is needed)
> I have looked in spec and I find
> %{?with_nvidia:BuildRequires: X11-driver-nvidia-devel}
> %{?with_opengl:BuildRequires: X11-driver-nvidia-
On Wed, 2005-09-07 at 11:30 +0200, Arkadiusz Miskiewicz wrote:
> On Wednesday 07 of September 2005 11:20, wrobell wrote:
>
> > i think (let's skip svn for now), we need:
> > - atomic commit (so we can commit patches and specs with one move
> > and revert it easily later if there is a need)
> - e
On Wed, 2005-09-07 at 11:03 +0200, Jan Rekorajski wrote:
> > you do _not_ have to keep _all_ tags/branches locally.
>
> Really? How?
> Example: http://svn.pld-linux.org/svn/rc-scripts
> I want to keep only trunk, branches and _some_ tags, tell me how to do
> it, and how to prevent svn up from gett
On Wednesday 07 of September 2005 11:20, wrobell wrote:
> i think (let's skip svn for now), we need:
> - atomic commit (so we can commit patches and specs with one move
> and revert it easily later if there is a need)
- easier work on branches without messing the way it recently happened with
s
On Wed, 2005-09-07 at 11:03 +0200, Jan Rekorajski wrote:
> On Wed, 07 Sep 2005, wrobell wrote:
>
> > On Tue, 2005-09-06 at 19:27 +0200, Jan Rekorajski wrote:
> > > On Tue, 06 Sep 2005, wrobell wrote:
> > >
> > > > On Tue, 2005-09-06 at 18:46 +0200, Michal Kochanowicz wrote:
> > > > > On Tue, Sep
On Wed, 07 Sep 2005, wrobell wrote:
> On Tue, 2005-09-06 at 19:27 +0200, Jan Rekorajski wrote:
> > On Tue, 06 Sep 2005, wrobell wrote:
> >
> > > On Tue, 2005-09-06 at 18:46 +0200, Michal Kochanowicz wrote:
> > > > On Tue, Sep 06, 2005 at 05:32:50PM +0100, wrobell wrote:
> > > > > let's start new
On Tue, 2005-09-06 at 19:27 +0200, Jan Rekorajski wrote:
> On Tue, 06 Sep 2005, wrobell wrote:
>
> > On Tue, 2005-09-06 at 18:46 +0200, Michal Kochanowicz wrote:
> > > On Tue, Sep 06, 2005 at 05:32:50PM +0100, wrobell wrote:
> > > > let's start new war...
> > > >
> > > > what about moving repo to
On Tue, 2005-09-06 at 20:30 +0200, Paweł Gołaszewski wrote:
> On Tue, 6 Sep 2005, wrobell wrote:
> > > Author: djurban Date: Tue Sep 6 16:24:57 2005 GMT
> > > Module: SOURCES Tag: HEAD
> > > Log message:
> > > - from ghostscript.spec's HEAD
> > > - l
18 matches
Mail list logo
