Hi,
Jan Rekorajski (Thursday 08 of September 2005 23:18):
> You ("svn fans" ;);) say [1] and then you say it's impossible to have
> changelog in files (no $Log$ impleneted in svn). For me it's pointless to
> have [1] functionality without being able to see the logs. So gain from
> [1] is eliminated
On Thursday 08 of September 2005 23:10, Jan Rekorajski wrote:
> > for pkg in `svn ls http://.../packages/`; do
> > do whatever you need
> > done
>
> Bzzt, argument line too long...
> Try again ;>
Yeah, then show me how to fetch single app with spec + patches using command
line - cvs and sh on
On Thu, 08 Sep 2005, Paweł Sakowski wrote:
> On Thu, 2005-09-08 at 01:36 +0200, Jan Rekorajski wrote:
> > > - it makes it impossible to revert by `cvs up -j` (you lose changelog
> > > entries)
> >
> > Is it really that important? After 6 years of work with our CVS I can't
> > remember needing it.
On Thu, 08 Sep 2005, Arkadiusz Miskiewicz wrote:
> On Thursday 08 of September 2005 20:27, Jakub Bogusz wrote:
> > On Tue, Sep 06, 2005 at 08:29:06PM +0200, Paweł Sakowski wrote:
> > > On Tue, 2005-09-06 at 19:27 +0200, Jan Rekorajski wrote:
> > > > At the cost of keeping ALL tags/branches locally
On Thursday 08 of September 2005 20:27, Jakub Bogusz wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 06, 2005 at 08:29:06PM +0200, Paweł Sakowski wrote:
> > On Tue, 2005-09-06 at 19:27 +0200, Jan Rekorajski wrote:
> > > At the cost of keeping ALL tags/branches locally. You're joking.
> > >
> > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] rpm]$ du -h
On Thu, 2005-09-08 at 01:36 +0200, Jan Rekorajski wrote:
> > - it makes it impossible to revert by `cvs up -j` (you lose changelog
> > entries)
>
> Is it really that important? After 6 years of work with our CVS I can't
> remember needing it.
Then how would you/did you ever revert a non-trivial r
On Tue, Sep 06, 2005 at 08:29:06PM +0200, Paweł Sakowski wrote:
> On Tue, 2005-09-06 at 19:27 +0200, Jan Rekorajski wrote:
> > At the cost of keeping ALL tags/branches locally. You're joking.
> >
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] rpm]$ du -hs SOURCES SPECS
> > 959MSOURCES
> > 63M SPECS
>
> Obviously
On 9/6/05, Jan Rekorajski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, 06 Sep 2005, wrobell wrote:
>
> > On Tue, 2005-09-06 at 18:46 +0200, Michal Kochanowicz wrote:
> > > On Tue, Sep 06, 2005 at 05:32:50PM +0100, wrobell wrote:
> > > > let's start new war...
> > > >
> > > > what about moving repo to svn?
On Thu, 2005-09-08 at 01:36 +0200, Jan Rekorajski wrote:
> On Wed, 07 Sep 2005, Paweł Sakowski wrote:
>
> > On Wed, 2005-09-07 at 10:20 +0100, wrobell wrote:
> > > - atomic commit (so we can commit patches and specs with one move
> > > and revert it easily later if there is a need)
> >
> > A pr
On Thu, 2005-09-08 at 01:53 +0200, Jan Rekorajski wrote:
> On Wed, 07 Sep 2005, wrobell wrote:
>
> > On Wed, 2005-09-07 at 11:03 +0200, Jan Rekorajski wrote:
> > > Example: http://svn.pld-linux.org/svn/rc-scripts
> > > I want to keep only trunk, branches and _some_ tags, tell me how to do
> > > it
10 matches
Mail list logo
