On Thu, 2005-09-08 at 01:53 +0200, Jan Rekorajski wrote:
On Wed, 07 Sep 2005, wrobell wrote:
On Wed, 2005-09-07 at 11:03 +0200, Jan Rekorajski wrote:
Example: http://svn.pld-linux.org/svn/rc-scripts
I want to keep only trunk, branches and _some_ tags, tell me how to do
it, and how to
On Thu, 2005-09-08 at 01:36 +0200, Jan Rekorajski wrote:
On Wed, 07 Sep 2005, Paweł Sakowski wrote:
On Wed, 2005-09-07 at 10:20 +0100, wrobell wrote:
- atomic commit (so we can commit patches and specs with one move
and revert it easily later if there is a need)
A propos
On 9/6/05, Jan Rekorajski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, 06 Sep 2005, wrobell wrote:
On Tue, 2005-09-06 at 18:46 +0200, Michal Kochanowicz wrote:
On Tue, Sep 06, 2005 at 05:32:50PM +0100, wrobell wrote:
let's start new war...
what about moving repo to svn?
Any reasons?
On Tue, Sep 06, 2005 at 08:29:06PM +0200, Paweł Sakowski wrote:
On Tue, 2005-09-06 at 19:27 +0200, Jan Rekorajski wrote:
At the cost of keeping ALL tags/branches locally. You're joking.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] rpm]$ du -hs SOURCES SPECS
959MSOURCES
63M SPECS
Obviously svn makes
On Thu, 2005-09-08 at 01:36 +0200, Jan Rekorajski wrote:
- it makes it impossible to revert by `cvs up -j` (you lose changelog
entries)
Is it really that important? After 6 years of work with our CVS I can't
remember needing it.
Then how would you/did you ever revert a non-trivial
On Thursday 08 of September 2005 20:27, Jakub Bogusz wrote:
On Tue, Sep 06, 2005 at 08:29:06PM +0200, Paweł Sakowski wrote:
On Tue, 2005-09-06 at 19:27 +0200, Jan Rekorajski wrote:
At the cost of keeping ALL tags/branches locally. You're joking.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] rpm]$ du -hs SOURCES
On Thu, 08 Sep 2005, Arkadiusz Miskiewicz wrote:
On Thursday 08 of September 2005 20:27, Jakub Bogusz wrote:
On Tue, Sep 06, 2005 at 08:29:06PM +0200, Paweł Sakowski wrote:
On Tue, 2005-09-06 at 19:27 +0200, Jan Rekorajski wrote:
At the cost of keeping ALL tags/branches locally. You're
On Thu, 08 Sep 2005, Paweł Sakowski wrote:
On Thu, 2005-09-08 at 01:36 +0200, Jan Rekorajski wrote:
- it makes it impossible to revert by `cvs up -j` (you lose changelog
entries)
Is it really that important? After 6 years of work with our CVS I can't
remember needing it.
Then how