Re: cvs vs svn... (Re: SOURCES: ghostscript-afpl-am.patch (NEW),

2005-09-14 Thread Paweł Sakowski
On Fri, 2005-09-09 at 17:19 +0200, Andrzej Krzysztofowicz wrote: > /me would like also to do sth like: > > rsync -a some-rsync-pld-server::cvs/SPECS > > (and minimizing network activity while doing this, of course) According to the docs, you can safely (and efficiently) rsync fsfs-based svn repo

Re: cvs vs svn reloaded

2005-09-14 Thread Paweł Sikora
Dnia środa, 14 września 2005 15:15, Paweł Sakowski napisał: > On Wed, 2005-09-14 at 15:02 +0200, Paweł Sikora wrote: > > http://subversion.tigris.org/faq.html#symlinks ? > > And what about them? we can create a flat specs directory with symlinks to sub-trunks to avoid dir traversing. -- The onl

Re: cvs vs svn reloaded

2005-09-14 Thread Paweł Sakowski
On Wed, 2005-09-14 at 15:02 +0200, Paweł Sikora wrote: > http://subversion.tigris.org/faq.html#symlinks ? And what about them? -- Paweł Sakowski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> PLD Linux Distribution ___ pld-devel-en mailing list pld-devel-en@lists.pld-linux.org

Re: cvs vs svn reloaded

2005-09-14 Thread Paweł Sikora
Dnia środa, 14 września 2005 12:59, Jakub Bogusz napisał: > (small summary before leaving Warsaw for a few days) > > Well, what I _need_ is to have local SPECS directory regularly updated > and be able to easily commit individual specs without traversing > directory structure all the time. > I _won

Re: cvs vs svn reloaded

2005-09-14 Thread Jakub Bogusz
(small summary before leaving Warsaw for a few days) Well, what I _need_ is to have local SPECS directory regularly updated and be able to easily commit individual specs without traversing directory structure all the time. I _won't_ sacrifice few times more time for multiple chdir()s or typing lon