Dnia 15-10-2005, sob o godzinie 21:25 +0200, Paweł Sakowski napisał(a):
> On Sat, 2005-10-15 at 18:04 +0200, Patrys :: Patryk Zawadzki wrote:
> > Could someone test if after my changes Firefox still suffers from memory
> > corruption
>
> It's currently being built to i386 ac-test. Go ahead and che
=?iso-8859-2?q?Micha=B3_=A3ukaszek?= wrote:
>
> Dnia sobota, 15 października 2005 17:15, glen napisał:
> > Author: glen Date: Sat Oct 15 15:15:43 2005 GMT
> > Module: SPECS Tag: HEAD
> > Log message:
> > - updated to 0.9.7i
>
> Just curious - w
On Sat, 2005-10-15 at 18:04 +0200, Patrys :: Patryk Zawadzki wrote:
> Could someone test if after my changes Firefox still suffers from memory
> corruption
It's currently being built to i386 ac-test. Go ahead and check if it
works better in your test case (you're using ix86, right?).
--
Paweł Sa
On Saturday 15 October 2005 19:54, sparky wrote:
> Author: sparky Date: Sat Oct 15 16:54:57 2005 GMT
> Module: SPECS Tag: HEAD
> Log message:
> - I was wrong, su -c does nead shel
add '-s /bin/sh' to su command
--
glen
___
Could someone test if after my changes Firefox still suffers from memory
corruption (displaying random memory parts as page content under some
circumstances) and if it does, does removing optimization parameter help
to fix it (if you don't pass it, firefox will build using default
optimization as i
On Sat, Oct 15, 2005 at 04:33:16PM +0300, Elan Ruusamäe wrote:
> On Saturday 15 October 2005 16:27, sparky wrote:
> > - if [ ! -x /opt/quake3/q3ded ]; then
> > + if [ ! -x /usr/bin/q3ded ]; then
> > fail
> put it to sbindir instead
why should I ?
Dnia sobota, 15 października 2005 17:15, glen napisał:
> Author: glen Date: Sat Oct 15 15:15:43 2005 GMT
> Module: SPECS Tag: HEAD
> Log message:
> - updated to 0.9.7i
Just curious - why not upgrade to 0.9.8a?
--
pozdrawiam,
prism (Michał Łuka
On Saturday 15 October 2005 16:27, sparky wrote:
> - if [ ! -x /opt/quake3/q3ded ]; then
> + if [ ! -x /usr/bin/q3ded ]; then
> fail
put it to sbindir instead
--
glen
___
pld-devel-en mailing list
pld-
athlon and amd64 are ok, while i686:
Retrieving ac::packages.ndir.md...
Retrieving ac::packages.ndir.gz...
.. 100.0% [9.2M (363.2K/s)]
error: http://ftp.pld-linux.org/dists/ac/[...]/packages.ndir.gz: broken file
Retrieving ac-ready::packages.ndir