Re: Firefox

2005-10-18 Thread Fryderyk Dziarmagowski
--- Patrys :: Patryk Zawadzki [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: it's because you added --disable-xft. it should be always enabled since pango/gtk+ uses xft for font rendering. Actually not. It uses it internally. Mozilla developer docs explicitly say to always use --disable-xft when

SPECS: mozilla-firefox-lang-pl.spec - PATCH

2005-10-18 Thread Maciej Witaszek
Hi, I try to remove a mozilla-firefox and mozilla-firefox-lang-pl package, but I get an error. The mozilla-firefox-lang-pl was build from SPEC - revision 1.20. === error log === [EMAIL PROTECTED] SPECS]$ sudo rpm -e mozilla-firefox-lang-pl mozilla-firefox-1.0.7 cat:

Re: Firefox

2005-10-18 Thread Jan Palus
I played with mozilla-firefox.spec today and managed to get more or less working firefox. I disabled freetype2 and enabled xft because firefox starts then and after all offical realeses seem to be built this way. The issues with faq.fedora.pl (see pld-users) and search engines crashing firefox

Re: SPECS: mozilla-firefox-lang-pl.spec - PATCH

2005-10-18 Thread Jakub Bogusz
On Tue, Oct 18, 2005 at 03:58:54PM +0200, Maciej Witaszek wrote: Hi, I try to remove a mozilla-firefox and mozilla-firefox-lang-pl package, but I get an error. The mozilla-firefox-lang-pl was build from SPEC - revision 1.20. === error log === [EMAIL PROTECTED] SPECS]$ sudo rpm -e

Re: SPECS: mozilla-firefox-lang-pl.spec - PATCH

2005-10-18 Thread Maciej Witaszek
Jakub Bogusz wrote: That's because rpm STILL ignores Requires(postun) :/ This is a weakness of PLD's rpm or rpm in general? [[ -f ]] doesn't expand shellglobs, so the condition will never be true (unless sb would make file named *-installed-chrome-txt). Yes, that's my mistake. This patch

Re: SPECS: mozilla-firefox-lang-pl.spec - PATCH

2005-10-18 Thread Mariusz Mazur
On wtorek 18 października 2005 19:36, Maciej Witaszek wrote: Jakub Bogusz wrote: That's because rpm STILL ignores Requires(postun) :/ This is a weakness of PLD's rpm or rpm in general? That's something Jeff will hapilly accept patches for. And we'd really need a patch for it. -- In the

Re: i686 poldek pndir indexes

2005-10-18 Thread Tomasz Pala
error: http://ftp.pld-linux.org/dists/ac/[...]/packages.ndir.gz: broken file warn: http://ftp.pld-linux.org/dists/ac/PLD/i686/PLD/RPMS/: load failed, skipped error: http://ftp.pld-linux.org/dists/ac/ready/i686/packages.ndir.gz: broken file warn: http://ftp.pld-linux.org/dists/ac/ready/i686/:

Re: i686 poldek pndir indexes

2005-10-18 Thread Pawel A. Gajda
Tuesday 18/10/2005 19:25:23, Tomasz Pala: error: http://ftp.pld-linux.org/dists/ac/[...]/packages.ndir.gz: broken file $ rpm -q poldek poldek-0.19.0-1.20051010.17.1 $ poldek --st pndir -s http://ftp.pld-linux.org/dists/ac/PLD/i686/PLD/RPMS/ Loading

Re: SPECS: udev.spec - add a helper script from Mandriva (does it need...

2005-10-18 Thread Jakub Piotr Cłapa
jpc wrote: +# from Mandriva CVS: +# http://cvs.mandriva.com/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/SPECS/udev/udev_import_usermap?rev=1.5 +Source7: udev_import_usermap This can be useful when one wants to port some legacy hotplug usermaps to udev rules painlessly. Maybe it shouldn't be installed even? +#