Dnia Tue, 13 Dec 2005 17:05:06 +0100, Tomasz Pala <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
napisał:
> I had already written that it can be nice feature on desktops. But when
> your system becomes operational? Means working services - that's what
> customers may be interested with.
Are You sure You've read previous
$ sudo rpm -Uvh RPMS/python-examples-2.4.1-1.athlon.rpm
error: Failed dependencies:
python-devel = 1:2.4.1-1 is needed by python-examples-2.4.1-1.athlon
IMO python-examples doesn't require python-devel. The same issue with
python-doc which requires python - what's it for? I for watching ex
On Tue 13. of December 2005 10:53, Andrzej Krzysztofowicz wrote:
> Elan =?iso-8859-1?q?Ruusam=E4e?= wrote:
> > On Monday 12 December 2005 19:06, you wrote:
> > > Author: czuczDate: Mon Dec 12 17:06:18 2005 GMT
> > > Module: SPECS Tag: HEAD
> > >
Oops, initially posted to -pl, should be -en.
On Tue, Dec 13, 2005 at 12:03:08PM +0100, glen wrote:
> Author: glen Date: Tue Dec 13 11:03:08 2005 GMT
> Module: SPECS Tag: HEAD
> Log message:
> - cat optional-packages.txt; rel 2
> @@ -8,7 +8,7 @
On Wed, Dec 07, 2005 at 01:45:34AM +0100, glen wrote:
> %package desktop
> -Summary: KDesktop - handling of desktop icons, popup menus etc.
> +Summary: KDesktop - handling of desktop icons, popup menus etc
> Summary(pl): KDesktop - obsługa ikon na pulpicie, menu itp.
Shouldn't "etc." end
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Dnia Mon, 12 Dec 2005 15:13:06 +0100, Tomasz Pala <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> napisał:
>
>>> Maybe you need just to have a choice ?
>> Exactly.
>>
> Choice means maintaining two stes of init scripts.
Nope. The current init scripts could be modified to expose all the
needed
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Dnia Sun, 11 Dec 2005 19:56:55 +0100, Tomasz Pala <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> napisał:
>
>> Anyway I simply do not believe, that
>> it's 'proven' to be two times faster, especially when speaking of
>> machines which have some real load.
>
> I'm testing it right now on my la
Tomasz Pala wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 13, 2005 at 02:55:35PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>> I'm testing it right now on my laptop( yea - it doesn't have this much
>> load, but it runnes few server-like daemons, like apache and mysql + pgsql
>> ). The boot speeds up *really*! X starts in like < 1
On Tue, Dec 13, 2005 at 02:55:35PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> I'm testing it right now on my laptop( yea - it doesn't have this much
> load, but it runnes few server-like daemons, like apache and mysql + pgsql
> ). The boot speeds up *really*! X starts in like < 10sec from powering on
Dnia Mon, 12 Dec 2005 15:13:06 +0100, Tomasz Pala <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
napisał:
>> Maybe you need just to have a choice ?
>
> Exactly.
>
Choice means maintaining two stes of init scripts.
The alternative to this is the workground made now - that the initng
doesn't start services/daemons dirrec
Dnia Sun, 11 Dec 2005 19:56:55 +0100, Tomasz Pala <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
napisał:
> Anyway I simply do not believe, that
> it's 'proven' to be two times faster, especially when speaking of
> machines which have some real load.
I'm testing it right now on my laptop( yea - it doesn't have this much
On Sun, Dec 11, 2005 at 04:21:15PM +0100, Daniel Dominik Rudnicki wrote:
> On Sunday 11 of December 2005 15:51, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >
> > blah blah blah
> >
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> yep
> --
Nothing like constructive discussion :-)
--
RegardsHavner {jid,mail}:ha
Elan =?iso-8859-1?q?Ruusam=E4e?= wrote:
>
> On Monday 12 December 2005 19:06, you wrote:
> > Author: czuczDate: Mon Dec 12 17:06:18 2005 GMT
> > Module: SPECS Tag: HEAD
> > Log message:
> > - %{_includedir} macro used
> what for?
> it's not safe
On Monday 12 December 2005 19:06, you wrote:
> Author: czuczDate: Mon Dec 12 17:06:18 2005 GMT
> Module: SPECS Tag: HEAD
> Log message:
> - %{_includedir} macro used
what for?
it's not safe thing to do.
if somebody redefines _includedir in .spec,
14 matches
Mail list logo
